From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: shigeru.fukaya@gmail.com Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8776: rx has nothing for `explicitly numbered group construct' Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 05:11:23 +0900 Message-ID: <29CC1FCEEA2A19shigeru.fukaya@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1306878360 22986 80.91.229.12 (31 May 2011 21:46:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 21:46:00 +0000 (UTC) To: 8776@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 31 23:45:56 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QRWl9-0003fb-Lr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 23:45:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58812 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRWl8-0006EO-B4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 17:45:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52627) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRWTt-0002U1-UY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 17:28:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRWTr-0000Uk-B2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 17:28:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45112) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRWTq-0000Ua-Qp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 17:28:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QRWTq-0002yd-4P; Tue, 31 May 2011 17:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: shigeru.fukaya@gmail.com Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 21:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 8776 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.130687725911410 (code B ref -1); Tue, 31 May 2011 21:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 May 2011 21:27:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QRWTS-0002xz-Gu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 17:27:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (helo=eggs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QRVJB-0000Sh-1A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:12:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRVIY-00044l-7z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:12:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.17] (port=44411 helo=lists.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRVIY-00042V-1R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:12:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54218 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRVIB-0001fj-Hi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:11:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRVHn-00040W-Qm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:11:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pz0-f41.google.com ([209.85.210.41]:47952) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRVHn-0003zg-Aa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:11:31 -0400 Original-Received: by pzk4 with SMTP id 4so2692103pzk.0 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 13:11:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:message-id; bh=2FaiRcsivs2sWIUq0XjuqpQUlq+VU+VpFXKhZyVLb6w=; b=D5u8bvn8tkj1KWo5KMonhpSez37ppIVjZdVaD+eEahvE9BEzDOYxPxGtMFYTvdDSPs 2vJe4zkLjQUXun08SU1MgkmcfYbmlf8B7Nh+fhh2X0e/oFfy86n/RjMDDz7ojRKZh1h8 qrti6GK06UO9NBBeM2lF/2JseBj8XmyASGA68= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:message-id; b=l6AmxpFb6qno5qJd7Ro4vIbkl4t8qbXpJNbFD5Bg51Z8qiHw6YYGPnPj4uNzpkBOAD QM06kkavzEPqhvoX2WD53dHfKhuCrSdRAbYFBofBzjsPfAAuK5bmHVikuXGEeO5npqSd 9Xnzojlnu5g2pWeThHMObndZ/qHlZsrdyYaXg= Original-Received: by 10.68.5.106 with SMTP id r10mr2388716pbr.405.1306872686746; Tue, 31 May 2011 13:11:26 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from gmail.com (115x125x38x6.ap115.ftth.ucom.ne.jp [115.125.38.6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i7sm303551pbj.90.2011.05.31.13.11.25 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 31 May 2011 13:11:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: HidemaruMail 5.62beta3 (WinNT,601) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 31 May 2011 17:27:36 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 17:28:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46854 Archived-At: Hello, rx.el in 23.1 through 24.50 has nothing for a regexp notation of "explicitly numbered group" construct incorporated in 23.1. Maybe would it be something like, `(group 'NUM ...)' or `(group-n NUM ...)' for `\(?NUM: ... \)', where NUM is an integer? Regards, Shigeru