From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 13:00:34 -0700 Message-ID: <29AB0198864E4E04858E487CA3DABBBB@us.oracle.com> References: <871umzrvfw.fsf@gmail.com> <87wr4rqg6g.fsf@gmail.com><83d36j59gv.fsf@gnu.org> <87r4uz58e3.fsf@sec.modprobe.de><83aa1n57p4.fsf@gnu.org><5D17181ED92C4552AE8D4404DD035CA0@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1336248059 31634 80.91.229.3 (5 May 2012 20:00:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 20:00:59 +0000 (UTC) To: "'Martyn Jago'" , Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 05 22:00:58 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SQl9y-0001I0-Ro for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 22:00:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49518 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQl9y-0001Pb-9x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 16:00:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35710) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQl9u-0001GF-CN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 16:00:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQl9s-0001bg-B0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 16:00:49 -0400 Original-Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com ([148.87.113.117]:23667) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQl9s-0001bQ-4W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 16:00:48 -0400 Original-Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q45K0hHi031070 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 5 May 2012 20:00:44 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q45K0ghh027887 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 5 May 2012 20:00:42 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt104.oracle.com (abhmt104.oracle.com [141.146.116.56]) by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q45K0gdP007928; Sat, 5 May 2012 15:00:42 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.221.111) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sat, 05 May 2012 13:00:41 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: Ac0q+EpGytaqTA8eS/i45tnuHovybwAACDow X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 148.87.113.117 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:150305 Archived-At: > Its plain text. And its the sort of thing any org-mode user > would do to identify emacs-lisp without even thinking about > it, and its explanatory. Sure, and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that. You apparently misunderstood. > If you are aiming to ban the use of plain text No. Again, you apparently misunderstood. Completely. > because it doesn't appeal to you, Plain text does appeal to me. You apparently misunderstood. > then I will question that. Question rather your reading. Or perhaps your knee-jerking. Dunno where the problem lies, but something is clearly off. > Org-mode is a very healthy Emacs library, and a lot of > people use it. Of course they do. And I'm all in favor of it. Including its markup and other annotations. You simply misunderstood, clearly.