From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: B Smith-Mannschott Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr branch makes bogus "No space left on device" claim and dies Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:21:26 +0100 Message-ID: <28c656e21001070721q6a0f6256r8a645c5080c44b68@mail.gmail.com> References: <28c656e21001050711v601b275fm837d5e7ea2126d2b@mail.gmail.com> <87iqbfnc7p.fsf@red-bean.com> <28c656e21001070610o79996729m17ca46cb416819e5@mail.gmail.com> <87eim2t0a7.fsf@red-bean.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262877962 29405 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2010 15:26:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 15:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 07 16:25:54 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NSuFB-0006gX-Bm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:25:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34390 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSuF9-00048z-Ry for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:25:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSuBO-0001m8-Gc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:21:54 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSuBJ-0001id-2d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:21:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54852 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSuBI-0001iV-PP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:21:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:11438) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NSuBI-0004hX-Ek for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:21:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ew0-f224.google.com ([209.85.219.224]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NSuBG-0002mr-Er for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:21:46 -0500 Original-Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so21700904ewy.26 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 07:21:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=GFC0Y+EyALZplQCsKRw7dHag94OAGWpHYwo8t6BwGQA=; b=OIB5bGif0oEDbs1hM8+zPyrSnOx2N987LbX7jQNgrmNC0DS9t+8c8fDcNLrZBUfC+/ 9MB1dA82eGbtIK+rAT4C8T3ikCmPkPYAj3fkab9jX4lS1yR7OC3K+SIJ4BMffm3GloyB 3ovM4LG2CY210eGjtUx68DLYkDwNy2x4GYb5Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HdrGHRx1OPOU4Lj2x+aGL5rtr5N5Y1vQTc5Ym2yBin5+f9zKh4BRkzEL5yNsIOyL/k naeNbToKzbLAeQTMxCAj8yWYw093IbI88kEZAmSFXxiE0M5p9COzIvbC/B1xV6xLdSPi bN36PO3t1WtmxFQBAmWAKs2x2yP8uqVhMVP1Q= Original-Received: by 10.213.43.83 with SMTP id v19mr1567236ebe.95.1262877686349; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 07:21:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87eim2t0a7.fsf@red-bean.com> X-detected-operating-system: by mx20.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119587 Archived-At: On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 16:14, Karl Fogel wrote: > B Smith-Mannschott writes: >>I grabbed this (300MB) today over my work connection. I tweaked >>trunk/.bzr/branch/branch.conf to point it to use http: instead of >>sftp. I was then able to bzr pull the week or so of missing revisions. >>It took about 40 minutes, downloaded something greater than 100MB [1] >>and ended up adding about 30MB to .bzr. > > Wow. =C2=A0It took me only 25 minutes *over a wireless modem* to pull the > whole trunk branch the first time, IIRC. =C2=A0I don't know why people ar= e > seeing such different timings. My connection here is fast. (I've seen 1GB/s downloading from a local Ubuntu mirror.) Latency, however, may be an issue: I'm in Europe (Austria), so my bits have to cross the Atlantic. Also, I'm using http, while you were using sftp. That may make a difference too. // Ben