From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: B Smith-Mannschott Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr branch makes bogus "No space left on device" claim and dies Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 15:10:19 +0100 Message-ID: <28c656e21001070610o79996729m17ca46cb416819e5@mail.gmail.com> References: <28c656e21001050711v601b275fm837d5e7ea2126d2b@mail.gmail.com> <87iqbfnc7p.fsf@red-bean.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262873438 11336 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2010 14:10:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 14:10:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 07 15:10:31 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NSt4I-0006iS-Jc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:10:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39758 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSt4I-0002mO-Sx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:10:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSt4C-0002m6-Es for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:10:24 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSt49-0002lO-08 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:10:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42202 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSt48-0002lL-Qn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:10:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ew0-f224.google.com ([209.85.219.224]:65026) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NSt48-0005Vh-CJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:10:20 -0500 Original-Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so21624149ewy.26 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 06:10:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gMZvuH49OwWhO8hQsEPrtwxIaWcPtTCYVOsgzRsCB3U=; b=varSQG6AcUwBEcxp82k4gTwspGO+sPJUPhx3BMGwrIMSDP2brzVQHtwJLZ5VFjiFNw fBbgT8lLg/LSDhuYJDkjLmMcU3erpKrM+GDA5wfwwcnm56gnOnUC8cQ2tEl1aKjZrCIc kiMpz/mjnqjK5QbOy63JTSM8rh8lky2jU9ets= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GxE80k52DwV5SzlTKaQdlXzoWM6YlP8Jfl4KjNFwRc5+ILAGLJKAl4FXu1jVtdU4tr wOxyywhEkvzRe/4PUJB3ufvu/rxODxv+o1nbZQbqZeI6mhdZ0wt04tihL5iVNIq6zHy3 8SAXK/9p1C30eZJI55SGPBL9wJ9f3brnaB7NE= Original-Received: by 10.213.99.212 with SMTP id v20mr264810ebn.7.1262873419542; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 06:10:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87iqbfnc7p.fsf@red-bean.com> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119574 Archived-At: Hi Karl, On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 04:28, Karl Fogel wrote: ... > Well, I put a tarball up here a week or so ago, so it should still be > useful as a starting point: > > =C2=A0http://www.red-bean.com/kfogel/emacs-bzr-repository.tar.gz I grabbed this (300MB) today over my work connection. I tweaked trunk/.bzr/branch/branch.conf to point it to use http: instead of sftp. I was then able to bzr pull the week or so of missing revisions. It took about 40 minutes, downloaded something greater than 100MB [1] and ended up adding about 30MB to .bzr. [1] I stopped watching after a few minutes, and unfortunately bzr wipes it's progress bar from the terminal once the download has completed, so there's no way to see how much data was finally transferred. It also doesn't write this to .bzr.log. Perhaps it should. So: your tarball was a help, thank you! However, I noticed that pulling from the mirror on lauchpad seems faster than savannah. Perhaps they're running a smartserver already? Is said mirror anything like official, or will it go away once the savannah teams gets loggerhead is working? I'll be honest: compared to git, bzr is something of a let down, but I don't much mind. I'm glad to have an excuse to learn more about bzr. (I'm a VCS generalist. I follow a couple of open source projects that use mercurial for the same reason.) // Ben