From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: B Smith-Mannschott Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr branch makes bogus "No space left on device" claim and dies Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 11:17:22 +0100 Message-ID: <28c656e21001060217r6a3f537fh886798f10334c12b@mail.gmail.com> References: <28c656e21001050711v601b275fm837d5e7ea2126d2b@mail.gmail.com> <878wccb7ix.fsf@bnikolic.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262773067 31074 80.91.229.12 (6 Jan 2010 10:17:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Bojan Nikolic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 06 11:17:40 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NSSxP-0006LN-Ml for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:17:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48897 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSSxP-0004Ym-NR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 05:17:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSSxG-0004Vm-TU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 05:17:30 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSSxC-0004Ow-Qx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 05:17:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47746 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSSxC-0004OX-Ih for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 05:17:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ew0-f224.google.com ([209.85.219.224]:42274) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NSSxC-0007NF-A2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 05:17:26 -0500 Original-Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so20180726ewy.26 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:17:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FZ4b0JZAFoi/IrNiCeyBxNFcFxCBSF2m/uTOYzO29oQ=; b=ITBxnAXCozMo6Td3sfJN2AchDERunZdkvmJs8YrEF5VsZy3wtqhu4EIN6ZAueatszq QNFyzRlyN2F1adJyIyHEk0Rr6+jcnAHtu1+9u2K8KsTE+RKAld4AgNoOk8p9Z24ZJ9i8 b0VPbXCxCLWGeRTJm+ETIQEDaOJ2bPFXMu7O0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Uop7P0zA3OZiya6V2VVBJ4ZhcZY0w9+wu+NYm4ll0xEXa7j2tjXzM3oDJy4rwSW6lz 3N8WnBwL+qP31W40claqE8OTZ8N3YUlGoO5hYHidYhMa3DkQhehUxfuLHGa6aVAmDK3C lb6mPyVifbLl3SwwHcSSuS96YmVp5Qglcn/xQ= Original-Received: by 10.213.2.70 with SMTP id 6mr25325185ebi.25.1262773044969; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:17:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <878wccb7ix.fsf@bnikolic.co.uk> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119514 Archived-At: On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 21:50, Bojan Nikolic wrote: > > I've just tried exactly what you did on quite a similar setup to yours: > > bzr --version > Bazaar (bzr) 2.0.1 > =C2=A0Python interpreter: /usr/bin/python 2.6.4 > =C2=A0Python standard library: /usr/lib/python2.6 > =C2=A0Platform: Linux-2.6.31-16-generic-x86_64-with-Ubuntu-9.10-karmic > =C2=A0bzrlib: /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/bzrlib > =C2=A0Bazaar configuration: /home/bnikolic/.bazaar > =C2=A0Bazaar log file: /home/bnikolic/.bzr.log > > and everything worked fine. > > Do you know why do you get the 'No handlers could be found for logger > "bzr"' message? A quick google suggests this could be symptomatic of > problems with stale locks.... No, I have no idea why it occurs. Thus far, I've observed no ill effects. I'll investigate it and see if I can figure it out what's causing it. Thanks for the suggestion. // Ben