From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#30399: 27.0.50; tooltips are broken Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 06:43:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <28591819-f037-4517-b9b1-210b3f103114@default> References: <87wozn9kyy.fsf@gmx.net> <5A7D6F9A.1010504@gmx.at> <5A7EBFC2.1040104@gmx.at> <0f060af6-d348-4d38-806e-a0d6d9f194ff@default> <5A800E8F.60706@gmx.at> <5A815DD0.9090205@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1518446766 1372 195.159.176.226 (12 Feb 2018 14:46:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:46:06 +0000 (UTC) To: martin rudalics , Stephen Berman , 30399@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 12 15:46:01 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1elFMl-0008Ro-Tm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 15:46:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39854 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1elFOn-0004VJ-Cd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 09:48:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40366) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1elFLv-0002d8-VC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 09:45:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1elFLq-0001gH-8H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 09:45:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59360) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1elFLq-0001fp-4O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 09:45:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1elFLp-0004lO-Jv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 09:45:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30399 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 30399-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30399.151844665018243 (code B ref 30399); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30399) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Feb 2018 14:44:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39024 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1elFL0-0004kB-Dg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 09:44:10 -0500 Original-Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com ([141.146.126.78]:38998) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1elFKx-0004jr-Uz for 30399@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 09:44:08 -0500 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w1CEgGCD173916; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:44:02 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2017-10-26; bh=vJUw8jLAOGoyjT2RGg1GIF/g/XaimCAVJVZNKsrZvSY=; b=Nt+OxDyr5OVLAv/fGkAYT3TPTWiGYvL9AC942TSK+Ke12/KlO+S7TiBhEgkxy1KUOVUU /Q58DE/SIiDwzNzT5vl88DKPGsappQxESlu8Xke1r5ivHMOE5KmfBjCPwsAIOzi0YBbT qBx4m3g+n0ZRKmO/g3gL4x7G/PwGLyYUxQQDw48xmM6Btz+Ys2noeJfm2odo5Se8HkiL nhVScJCvvh6uM5VfOBzmwTmfgAep0LFJdVWceFO0vdOVMIMYorLDhTUwVO+dXeAX+emW xoJS8jpmKW0iyKIeVEte10DheJ2TXZwfz05jyviMIkjM4Z+RQOgEyv9RS01OGuY6a9OY 4w== Original-Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by aserp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2g3bve8djg-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:44:01 +0000 Original-Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by userv0021.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w1CEi1SQ015301 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:44:01 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0002.oracle.com (abhmp0002.oracle.com [141.146.116.8]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w1CEhwJe011805; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:43:59 GMT In-Reply-To: <5A815DD0.9090205@gmx.at> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4639.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=8802 signatures=668668 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=844 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1802120190 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:143199 Archived-At: > > You imply that "the behavior of 'x-show-tip'" will > > change. That's what I'm asking about, in talking > > about "replacement". >=20 > 'x-show-tip' had a bug that has been hopefully fixed. > I did not imply anything else. That's good to hear. That was not clear to me. > > You also said that we should not use 'x-show-tip' > > but should use only `tooltip-show', which is much > > more limited - not a substitute for 'x-show-tip' > > at all. >=20 > I'm using 'x-show-tip' in my private code, so why > should I say such a thing. I certainly got the wrong impression from what you wrote, then. Thanks for clarifying. > > The question is, if `x-tool-tip' is not expected > > to be replaced, but it is expected to change, just > > _how_ is it expected to change? > > > > Will we be able to do with the "new" `x-show-tip', > > what we can do with it now, even if we must "adapt" > > in some way to be able to do that? >=20 > Hopefully so. Very good to hear. Glad I asked for clarification, and thank you for clarifying. None of what you say now was clear (to me) from your previous msgs in this thread. Sorry, if the misunderstanding was my fault here. And thanks for fixing the `x-show-tip' bug.