From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: A Soare Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [alinsoar@voila.fr: this is a bug?] Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:10:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <28338702.917781174990244387.JavaMail.www@wwinf4206> Reply-To: alinsoar@voila.fr NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1174990263 19896 80.91.229.12 (27 Mar 2007 10:11:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:11:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Emacs Dev \[emacs-devel\]" To: Francesco Potorti` Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 27 12:10:57 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HW8dj-0008QA-77 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:10:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HW8g4-0005EX-51 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 05:13:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HW8fz-0005E1-KO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 06:13:15 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HW8fw-0005DZ-T5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 06:13:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HW8fw-0005DW-Oc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 05:13:12 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp3.voila.fr ([193.252.22.173]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HW8dZ-00080O-Nt; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 06:10:45 -0400 Original-Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf4203.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 71FA11C000D4; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:10:44 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from wwinf4206 (wwinf4206 [10.232.2.33]) by mwinf4203.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 619D81C000D3; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:10:44 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20070327101044399.619D81C000D3@mwinf4203.voila.fr X-Originating-IP: [89.34.170.37] X-Wum-Nature: EMAIL-NATURE X-WUM-FROM: |~| X-WUM-TO: |~| X-WUM-CC: |~| X-WUM-REPLYTO: |~| X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68662 Archived-At: > >I report again, becuase this bug was ignored. > > In fact, I had answered to you, but received no reply. I append the > text of my previous mail at the end of this mail. Sorry, I found all these messages in spam, and corbeille, because it was automatically deleted. > > > I rewrite it into an easier to reproduce form: > >1. Emacs -Q > >2. M-. Lisp_Type > >Select then the path to your TAGS file of your emacs. > > All well until here. > > >The first 4 members of this enumeration are listed in yellow color to > >me . The last 4 members in black color . > > What enumeration? Why are the colours important? > > What I see is that the buffer shows the lisp.h file, and the cursor is > at the line of the definition of "enum Lisp_Type", which is what I > expect. > > >So this is a bug. > > I cannot reproduce it. After the second step of you description, what > path do you enter? What do you see exactly after that? Does Emacs open > the lisp.h file? The problem is just about the definition of FONT LOCK of C mode. Why the first 4 members are yellow,Lisp_Int,Lisp_Symbol,Lisp_Misc,Lisp_String, and the last 4 members are white? This is a bug evidently in FONT LOCK.