From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "alin.s" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: redisplay system of emacs Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:13:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <27585994.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <27349166.post@talk.nabble.com> <27560255.post@talk.nabble.com> <4B754E74.8060705@swipnet.se> <27563610.post@talk.nabble.com> <4B7564C7.1010309@swipnet.se> <27564728.post@talk.nabble.com> <4B756FB7.3050202@swipnet.se> <87k4ui4gik.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <27566385.post@talk.nabble.com> <87wryi2sjd.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1266174813 780 80.91.229.12 (14 Feb 2010 19:13:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:13:33 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 14 20:13:31 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NgjuL-0003Fj-Ly for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:13:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54604 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NgjuK-0000w7-V3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:13:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NgjuF-0000v9-VR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:13:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45625 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NgjuF-0000uo-CA for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:13:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NgjuE-0008Gi-Tx for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:13:23 -0500 Original-Received: from kuber.nabble.com ([216.139.236.158]:52749) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NgjuE-0008Gb-Q6 for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:13:22 -0500 Original-Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NgjuE-0003eT-D6 for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:13:22 -0800 In-Reply-To: <87wryi2sjd.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-Nabble-From: alinsoar@voila.fr X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121120 Archived-At: > The structure of windows is changed only when configure event is > caught or when one changes the font, or split windows, etc. So very > rarely. Every insertion of a single character of a proportional font will change the "windows" layout. This is true, because not all characters have the same width. Anyways, the idea of many subwindows was not good. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/redisplay-system-of-emacs-tp27349166p27585994.html Sent from the Emacs - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.