From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "alin.s" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Next pretest Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:34:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <27346355.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <87fx5vef1j.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <27296016.post@talk.nabble.com> <4B5C76B2.5080702@harpegolden.net> <87tyubryet.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1264624494 22653 80.91.229.12 (27 Jan 2010 20:34:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:34:54 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 27 21:34:49 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NaEbA-0001L9-Ja for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:34:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50861 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NaEb9-0001se-TS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:34:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NaEad-0001PO-7r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:34:15 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NaEaY-0001KY-Fe for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:34:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38469 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NaEaY-0001KG-80 for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:34:10 -0500 Original-Received: from kuber.nabble.com ([216.139.236.158]:41699) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NaEaX-0006GI-NZ for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:34:10 -0500 Original-Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NaEaW-000278-6I for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:34:08 -0800 In-Reply-To: <87tyubryet.fsf@stupidchicken.com> X-Nabble-From: alinsoar@voila.fr X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120524 Archived-At: seewhydee wrote: > >> It sounds like you have another tab implementation for one of ~6 UI >> systems where we'd like to see it. I look forward to seeing it, but >> mentioning it as if it would be part of a pretest in less than a week >> seems confusing at best. > > No, it will not be part of the pretest, nor in Emacs 23.2. > The tabs will late a period, because this evening I did have an idea , and I give up everything what I did. I had done using the model of Mozilla for commuting frames, but in emacs the tabs can do much more than in mozilla. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Next-pretest-tp27295593p27346355.html Sent from the Emacs - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.