From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "alin.s" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A separate mailing list for most bug report ticket mail? Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:49:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <27173342.post@talk.nabble.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263541776 30870 80.91.229.12 (15 Jan 2010 07:49:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 07:49:36 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 15 08:49:28 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NVgvv-00024a-Pn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:49:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59168 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVgvw-0005UX-7w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:49:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVgvr-0005Sp-7d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:49:23 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVgvm-0005PS-B4 for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:49:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49495 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVgvm-0005PN-8m for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:49:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:2679) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVgvl-0004nr-Ni for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:49:17 -0500 Original-Received: from kuber.nabble.com ([216.139.236.158]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVgvj-0001sp-Pa for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:49:16 -0500 Original-Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NVgvi-00089g-CP for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:49:14 -0800 In-Reply-To: X-Nabble-From: alinsoar@voila.fr X-detected-operating-system: by mx20.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120048 Archived-At: Concerning Emacs discussions lists, I would be interested first of all about a forum IDENTICAL to a forum in which one discusses the solutions of exercises from SICP. Such a forum, to discuss only about Emacs Lisp problems, does not exist. Neither for SICP does not exist an ideal one. I am subscribed at emacs-devel, I receive thousands of messages, but I do not read them, I am not interested about 99% of them. Here is a post that would be ideal for such a forum : http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3467. Richard Stallman wrote: > > How about if we direct most debbugs command and ack mail to a separate > list? People who want to see those messages could do so by > subscribing to both lists, and people who don't want to see them > (including me) could be on emacs-devel alone. > > As for messages from humans discussing the bug, > we would still send them to emacs-devel. > > > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-separate-mailing-list-for-most-bug-report-ticket-mail--tp27162776p27173342.html Sent from the Emacs - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.