From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggested experimental test Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 20:22:36 +0000 Message-ID: <271290d7aaec41df5fde@heytings.org> References: <831ba60af0cbfdd95686@heytings.org> <87mtuxj8ue.fsf@gnus.org> <9088e12cb3de3d30abf1@heytings.org> <8735wnjsum.fsf@gnus.org> <87tup3hwat.fsf_-_@gnus.org> <834kh39fvj.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5537"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Stephan.Mueller@microsoft.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 22 21:24:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lOR5w-0001LZ-Bl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 21:24:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40176 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOR5v-0007CU-D7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 16:24:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60526) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOR4X-0005ym-JB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 16:22:45 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:41172) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOR4R-0007Wi-Sr; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 16:22:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1616444556; bh=gg3ZSLQuEPNHBUSivXMJmw02QdQaL9muFXoMMIWyXos=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=csrtzB4D8GVNkyLbMHCk+h1rf1w3sLGPNXv6lG+zP7E4JZ8YMVpOB9Ifqgl50UvOE zWw8+KYfCAiGOo2szKQjFa3NOZ89j9/2ftxszoubey2ZO9muaHsWWbGhnrE7GY1p0+ 1ikpeZHKEQDOWRLhiAm0iL3lyQw48ML5LJvWKHjbSGBYKr3AYGYzepxAdwMM64XhL+ stDrDObFtcnUDhQtr/2MfHVH7lNx1cn0oFwiC0h88spKesToWfRFvjS0ppCu2kR8Jl JjpNuYqjpBWIhIin9KJXuY1pfmUye2yEuMAevDfcX8uL9hm5xc37rgLNfLb1P7ZDho abmUN2Opnf1ww== In-Reply-To: <834kh39fvj.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266819 Archived-At: >>> I use C-o (usually followed by C-n) many times a day, instead of >>> , in order to suppress re-indentation of the current line in >>> cases where that re-indentation will be incorrect for my purposes**. >> >> Oh, I see -- it's useful as an alternative to `RET' exactly when >> re-indentation does the wrong thing? > > Yes, but not only that -- it doesn't move point to the next line, unlike > RET. > Why should a control key must be reserved forever for that very specific purpose, and for that very specific purpose only, in the default Emacs bindings? That's something that could be moved on, say, M-RET (and possibly improved).