From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggested experimental test Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 17:55:31 +0000 Message-ID: <271290d7aac58f2f9e96@heytings.org> References: <831ba60af0cbfdd95686@heytings.org> <87mtuxj8ue.fsf@gnus.org> <9088e12cb3de3d30abf1@heytings.org> <8735wnjsum.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg4n9jei.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13560"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 22 18:57:05 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lOOnY-0003Pq-W7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:57:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51328 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOOnX-0008LP-UN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 13:57:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52400) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOOmC-0007cs-3V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 13:55:40 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:40832) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOOm6-0002sB-Oe; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 13:55:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1616435732; bh=kZbpVuWeCktsADQ2D/Ob0rvqKyTcHzUBHm1D1J9/WJo=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=qJApPUdmrY6c7BJ3LGtMTJ5ZZprkedPVOyBp+tSFw883A/+BEQjIlIQqVpQLM7hQo 6HtNqFML5B3L+DxRCXwG5SroylrdKa90OhZXmdOimB1VbQMLD6khFmtnlDK7wN+RgG vaSb66PpfJuXKqmTql636RDmQDn8z3v8Z7xzyxIs1P+Dc4a59wscmX4oSXhBKAIvJW 4RFvXF16XZXqBfNHQQXgEtwZhiOvMeQlV54QCIHULsBhKzms2ZuEk8hwS4ShVq9MBx Un0sISCcn7zxwnsffU5ozW6w4s7PAkyJWNYmzlMtYU5od5tuFKXrXg24BA1vlfZr25 Re77AnGY1ALhg== In-Reply-To: <83sg4n9jei.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266769 Archived-At: >> I don't use `C-o' myself, so I can't really say to what degree this >> would be annoying or not for users. Any `C-o' users who have an >> opinion here? > > I use it _a_lot_. > But of course, as you said a month ago: > > This question also goes to everyone else in this long dispute who wants > their precious key bindings preserved: why is such a long discussion > needed when it is so easy to restore, in your init file, a binding you > want preserved? >