Re: Should we extend org-catch-invisible-edits to more interactive commands? (was: Catching invisible edits: problem understanding doc)

[Alain.Cochard@unistra.fr]

Ihor Radchenko writes on Sat 11 Feb 2023 18:22:

 > We can indeed at such warning, but it will probably be not very
 > helpful.

I don't understand this.  And isn't it better to have a more accurate
manual anyway?

Apart from that, since the default value in 9.6 is 'smart' ('nil' in
9.5), I wonder if the sentence

   "Setting ‘org-fold-catch-invisible-edits’ to non-‘nil’ helps
   preventing this."

is still the most appropriate.

Also, this is another instance where 'C-h v' with the cursor on
'org-fold-catch-invisible-edits' does not offer it right away in the
minibuffer.  I am surprised since it does so in 9.5 (with
'org-catch-invisible-edit').

 > Only typing, deleting char forward/backward and meta-return are
 > considering invisible edits now.

Thanks.  It is helpful to me to know that.

-- 
EOST (École et Observatoire des Sciences de la Terre) 
ITE (Institut Terre & Environnement) | alain.cochard@unistra.fr
5 rue René Descartes   [bureau 110]  | Phone: +33 (0)3 68 85 50 44 
F-67084 Strasbourg Cedex, France     | [ slot available for rent ]