From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jim Porter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#68881: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Field properties confuse 'outline-minor-mode' Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 13:14:34 -0800 Message-ID: <254d7a98-d39d-2481-5a2a-01eea80fb657@gmail.com> References: <83986cee-a32d-707f-6ee0-ec1ba2bd42c2@gmail.com> <86a5ocgp74.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86cyt4t96u.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36231"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 68881@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 10 22:26:10 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rYurS-0009Hr-EP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 22:26:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rYur6-0006bz-Ij; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 16:25:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rYur5-0006bW-4f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 16:25:47 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rYur4-0002CV-TL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 16:25:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rYurK-0007l9-FW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 16:26:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jim Porter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 21:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68881 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 68881-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68881.170760031829706 (code B ref 68881); Sat, 10 Feb 2024 21:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 68881) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2024 21:25:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42764 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rYuqb-0007j2-JQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 16:25:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pg1-x531.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::531]:46507) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rYugX-0007EG-DY for 68881@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 16:14:53 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pg1-x531.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-5d8b519e438so1746539a12.1 for <68881@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 13:14:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1707599671; x=1708204471; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AnERSqfkA8JGsUrShui6Py6Np1JfaCJTrWewqRMiHy0=; b=cn9pSKrdYyHovcQhFuHYVaVox9PSkB1e7YAr732Ppdc9Y4CiGl2Nvm27YVyN+QD3Tx 57Hly7XGs7bThyC6WqlhvbK0m0xiRF/RobKB9wL6gV+zeyjH5FwasZfA/FDYy7hRTEkD uHQaWjU9KTjL0RJ35Vi91Ot+SOArhOdTQwq/kO4zHQQ0d5xT9L8mheXq11seQyqgb5tZ kup2NLUfZIfjYOrs8CoqSZH2rax+VmaPb/RY1fZ6u9Xo9EqcWub+ih8Mp1fFc8Dd5NfY i8th+uNWCWgSZ3e3F2YYbvCb3t3GB4svF+hdztrlA3y9KOVO0ulPHiilB71n/067cPg4 GdqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1707599671; x=1708204471; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AnERSqfkA8JGsUrShui6Py6Np1JfaCJTrWewqRMiHy0=; b=Rb+mK4ngAzBQN1dPJpO2ZklTAQ11hBshLHLbZzymnNpJiyu1TnvrX+XCXkOmYgxuef fbEziM4BVdkU59KyCgeJelpJ/UPZx/pCbSgOwlxKBI9f+H/cjcmkMEW1e4CT0kJCIswU mqmRZmWzOZrd4cQ/R03BX6/lgvnu39x5oqAzYQQEhFq7tAsJYIYuuPuUmYZJTbp2z6wu jwAtnFPNIxjXEQi2RCQqZFCSToeBiAcKJcc8gzp6HGGWLG8bjUAZr/EVgSz/CMgnFXOC N8r3WPLto3Dn6HHtsbk4l/bkTM1aoBvmwyQAOmqhEWHJfYr79o6E23S41caOI6sBn03Y Go/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzBTtxFXXQZOCauUiiAX7EIOWSs9GH1AB/lLaY4he6WzAdnbUCR vpEuEuQ5xI+D42VK9zO5yoDhwxiNEfJALXmXPcXAxQP6OQ1ah/hD X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHSMh2GBRU1KqxLvOcKHyR2uf8k2S78MCP5m33rVC6vQdOd+o1h9ScDtH3oEkakPHTJ1QtK6g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:9d91:b0:19e:b192:1db2 with SMTP id mu17-20020a056a209d9100b0019eb1921db2mr2079398pzb.30.1707599671503; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 13:14:31 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWEasbcwUeJpn6waVahV8iyvjtBGnG9EFAUC9rwAGJwxmZk5znDGz3iGjscwycIXFBruJyJ6wypuGPiIS5TPjg= Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (076-168-148-233.res.spectrum.com. [76.168.148.233]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id q5-20020a632a05000000b005d34cf68664sm4048765pgq.25.2024.02.10.13.14.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 10 Feb 2024 13:14:30 -0800 (PST) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <86cyt4t96u.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:279799 Archived-At: On 2/10/2024 11:23 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I don't understand what text directionality has to do with the issue > at hand. If you elaborate, I could perhaps be of assistance in this > matter. I think nothing in this case. I just wasn't sure initially whether 'pos-bol' and 'line-beginning-position' handled directionality differently. Since they handle it the same way, I think there's no harm in using 'pos-bol' in this case.