From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: LENNART BORGMAN Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Canceling dialogues Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 10:58:49 +0200 Message-ID: <250caed25124a7.25124a7250caed@net.lu.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1154423468 3739 80.91.229.2 (1 Aug 2006 09:11:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 09:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 01 11:11:04 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7qHF-0004Yq-EU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 11:11:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7qHE-0000o1-Sw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 05:11:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G7qH4-0000ng-Id for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 05:10:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G7qH2-0000lK-IJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 05:10:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7qH2-0000lF-Fr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 05:10:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [130.235.208.46] (helo=piraten.student.lu.se) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G7qJp-00012U-4Q; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 05:13:41 -0400 Original-Received: from net.lu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by piraten.student.lu.se (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003)) with ESMTP id <0J3B00EPLAA1AF@piraten.student.lu.se>; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 10:58:49 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from [212.209.42.132] by piraten.student.lu.se (mshttpd); Tue, 01 Aug 2006 10:58:49 +0200 Original-To: Jason Rumney X-Mailer: iPlanet Messenger Express 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003) Content-language: sv Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: sv Priority: normal X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57929 Archived-At: > I don't think it is a good idea to indiscriminately add a > Cancel/Quit > option that appears to the user to be of equal importance as the > Yes or > No (or any other valid) options. Especially as some dialogs may > already > have an option of that name that does something other than > keyboard-quit. Then what do you think about letting ESC do what C-g does? Is not that actually what a user expects (at least on w32)?