From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: abq@bitrot.link Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why is lexical-binding's global value ignored? Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 15:34:28 -0700 Message-ID: <25094a24f891856fe0757fa34d80017b@bitrot.link> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9417"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 29 07:06:39 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pM0pr-0002H2-7v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 07:06:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pM0pL-0004Et-9e; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 01:06:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pLtmN-0004pQ-1l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 17:34:35 -0500 Original-Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:dc4:8::227]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pLtmK-0004Ak-Ur for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 17:34:34 -0500 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: root@bitrot.link) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5CD1A20004 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 22:34:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bitrot.link; s=gm1; t=1674945269; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bQxM8YxbsGVOqp8wPi8u0QZ85Vr/1XpDwt68Y9HTf4I=; b=bXLilSaap30UeKdX2G+yY31MzZRg6msoW9Kbg+F4bzRU/XVWWiDAP8ZocmAGBDY+FBHXcP S2pSW6ykCngOioKq2Eh5EIulHsTxGhPn4qZXVb8FVMluNRG2uyomFqRLT2WsGGVheyiJcL TI0XhMMD5Z95JBmnhQELqTTC8/Rd3uTSZJR6UC0UhvDtNL3zmwmZAtfsyMd8ooGjiFf3YR sCBCk+jBs569D5lhwjueJwD+Cl9xqkk/n0VDM7CFoCj6ooD1kcuR/jPEtOIl2gnjcP+Wkx BQFiW6gKLrZ0p7R0bT/UFiRL4yvQNRoOUibWKCS3KHyI9jOjHZaAPzVctN+yiw== In-Reply-To: X-Sender: abq@bitrot.link Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:4b98:dc4:8::227; envelope-from=abq@bitrot.link; helo=relay7-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 01:06:03 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:302737 Archived-At: tomas wrote: > The docs only talk about a buffer-local variable, so I'd guess that > the global variable of the same name is simply ignored. Yes, and my question is: Why not honor it, instead of ignoring it?