From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "T.V Raman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Request: Please add a prompt to read-event Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 06:45:16 -0800 Message-ID: <25033.53628.367367.378260@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> References: <87o85exsyv.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23314"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: raman@google.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: stefankangas@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 27 15:46:32 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n1rGi-0005xg-Ai for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 15:46:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38104 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1rGg-0004G5-Uw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 09:46:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57796) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1rFk-00036g-8M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 09:45:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [2607:f8b0:4864:20::1033] (port=33482 helo=mail-pj1-x1033.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1rFi-0005Hi-J8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 09:45:31 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-x1033.google.com with SMTP id x1-20020a17090a2b0100b001b103e48cfaso11398676pjc.0 for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 06:45:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:date:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references; bh=rUITaICtN7czKGh5wK9/wy+sBDTqPnkbcPF3dEwcYLk=; b=QQMOl2Up+4jCktA9R32P02Z29OZBo9rledG5nF97NJ/v/MDsumlgeXKRV041lp25kn +Q2nuVPnS+KQ7Pa/XlI8CdEwCHzuW2Dj59td+6XIDKb2vraP0kDE48PdnMcmWXx3JMdz /xUDFPt9JogTd8UKHxe6CZz3ehrMs74pNkBaq/fHvImh8B5kQQrSXRuCX4R5Tq8x9Yc1 xNn/LYSPvVcBe/k8AQ5/HBHjTpKhv//QdlPQ2rbFVVWrBQjwaO/eQhaSta2SVbFP1GPP 61AOtqwwdA5iDlVM83DSGI+GB/mQOG5tmuC2sXL6V8N/5xvYhErZVA/26suwgrx6QO6p yt0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references; bh=rUITaICtN7czKGh5wK9/wy+sBDTqPnkbcPF3dEwcYLk=; b=Slimeb403evVyJFzXK4BF4UBIlne2ivm2YB/PF5Hry9ON9ycM7ArcgEyGouiFU8T6h Sdrxsf6r6S4bKpBE8qBSIYq7Z1fL8TXZs34TzRYFwn1OXd6sFS7Ga1CDUxRT25vbs+HN TpEchTy0Xb3Tk8Jn0sKhDzNzVKkm/Ao1xNtq8voXl/r02J58x3Avva/BvqfY8FLOdHGF sxxqMt3OMgxdsIZLFQECNlkx19iUAg+e7+XwnqIrnXBw4MI/J26nL/tGIVogEF35p8zQ 6KL7+4M9w1ehMmsPYicpj6QlsGslcVDt0QZ21ecTh4kAy8vCJiTjitqQMyo+izohmT7m 9c2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5305Px3DoEq3Ld170WHhtrEvoxlsI5SGfId/bcFiQcnYjurl+/tp H3YX+sLqi7X+XQiriLpu/y8eEiA3VuVFEA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyBYf9G5Lro5el8RxnQdrvxdPPZrlq33Vn/XcYBdTqFS/0SLi4hqmPDOuYBk+WWfC6KHvHNcQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:eb12:: with SMTP id j18mr21408345pjz.156.1640616327274; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 06:45:27 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from retriever.mtv.corp.google.com ([2620:0:1000:1510:3581:200d:fe03:9c1b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z18sm18802845pfe.146.2021.12.27.06.45.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 27 Dec 2021 06:45:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.1.1 under 28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2607:f8b0:4864:20::1033 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::1033; envelope-from=raman@google.com; helo=mail-pj1-x1033.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -181 X-Spam_score: -18.2 X-Spam_bar: ------------------ X-Spam_report: (-18.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.363, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:283430 Archived-At: Emacspeak is happy either way, either with Lars' smaller fix or your read-multiple-choice update Stefan Kangas writes: > "TV. Raman" writes: >=20 > > Also, could we push this change to a Max 28 as opposed to just lea= ving it > > on master=3F > > > > Thanks! >=20 > I think we could cherry-pick Lars' fix, as it is small enough. That= > change is enough to resolve the issue for emacspeak users, right=3F >=20 > My change goes further, and I don't think it's safe enough for emacs= -28 > this close to the release. >=20 > Eli and Lars, what do you think=3F --=20 Thanks, --Raman(I Search, I Find, I Misplace, I Research) =E2=99=89 Id: kg:/m/0285kf1 =F0=9F=A6=AE -- Thanks, --Raman(I Search, I Find, I Misplace, I Research) ♉ Id: kg:/m/0285kf1 🦮