From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Vinicius Jose Latorre" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:04:02 -0200 Message-ID: <2434610802080404j223d8f8bjbb355ba15c6dbd84@mail.gmail.com> References: <47A93D3A.90308@gnu.org> <47AA7C97.2020505@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_18753_21554215.1202472242327" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202472350 5305 80.91.229.12 (8 Feb 2008 12:05:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 12:05:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, rv@gnu.org, mwd@cert.org, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Miles Bader To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 08 13:06:11 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JNRz5-0001nA-2V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:05:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JNRyc-00022V-De for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 07:05:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JNRxk-00018Q-Gk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 07:04:12 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JNRxj-00017a-Om for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 07:04:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JNRxj-00017L-Ck for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 07:04:11 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JNRxi-0001O3-RY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 07:04:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JNRxi-00058K-Gq for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 07:04:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JNRxe-0001Mv-3R for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 07:04:09 -0500 Original-Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.214.237]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JNRxd-0001MG-9N for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 07:04:05 -0500 Original-Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 23so6005106huc.1 for ; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 04:04:03 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.150.216.8 with SMTP id o8mr2811687ybg.138.1202472242440; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 04:04:02 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.151.7.13 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Feb 2008 04:04:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88513 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:20946 Archived-At: ------=_Part_18753_21554215.1202472242327 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline > I gather that Richard wanted the new functionality to use the > "whitespace" name, which makes some sense, but it seems seems to have > been done rather clumsily in some cases. E.g. the new > "whitespace-buffer" command seems completely different than the old > "whitespace-buffer" command, and really there seems no good reason for > it. > > Vinicius, can you fix up these wrinkles? Yes, I can when I return back to my city. ------=_Part_18753_21554215.1202472242327 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
   I gather that Richard wanted the new functionality to use the
   "whitespace" name, which makes some sense, but it seems seems to have
   been done rather clumsily in some cases.  E.g. the new
   "whitespace-buffer" command seems completely different than the old
   "whitespace-buffer" command, and really there seems no good reason for
   it.

Vinicius, can you fix up these wrinkles?
 
 
Yes, I can when I return back to my city.
 


 
------=_Part_18753_21554215.1202472242327--