From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Subject: Re: Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:10:52 -0400
Message-ID: <24271.1309302652@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net>
References: <devnull@Karl-Voit.at> <2011-06-24T16-30-43@devnull.Karl-Voit.at>
	<8772.1308931315@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
	<BANLkTikqjj+voLJM4ZM_51v=k5MREA9QKg@mail.gmail.com>
	<2011-06-26T13-23-38@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <8739ivw8e8.fsf@gnu.org>
	<2011-06-28T15-28-18@devnull.Karl-Voit.at>
	<2011-06-28T18-04-12@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <87sjqt6f3i.fsf@gnu.org>
	<2011-06-28T20-40-40@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <874o39v9td.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53387)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1QbhQq-0004bL-ER
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:11:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1QbhQo-0007Cq-Jp
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:11:00 -0400
Received: from g6t0184.atlanta.hp.com ([15.193.32.61]:1892)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1QbhQo-0007CN-8h
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:10:58 -0400
In-Reply-To: Message from Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
	of "Wed\, 29 Jun 2011 01\:02\:38 +0200." <874o39v9td.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Cc: news1142@Karl-Voit.at, nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Bastien <bzg@altern.org> wrote:

> Hello Karl,
>=20
> Karl Voit <devnull@Karl-Voit.at> writes:
>=20
> > Sorry when I disagree for one case:
> >
> > When I change each entry in my test data using =C2=ABC-c .=C2=BB and cl=
icking
> > on 1st of July ...
> >
> > ,----[ test data ]
> > | <2011-06-28 Tue>
> > | <2011-06-28 Tue +1w>
> > | <2011-06-28 Tue -1d>
> > | <2011-06-28 Tue +1w -1d>
> > `----
> >
> > ... I end up having this:
> >
> > ,----[ result ]
> > | <2011-07-01 Fri>
> > | <2011-07-01 Fri +1w>
> > | <2011-07-01 Fri -1d>
> > | <2011-07-01 Fri -1d>
> > `----
> >
> > In the last case, the repeater gets lost :-(
>=20
> I cannot reproduce this.
>=20

I can - but after earlier today, I'm not sure I trust my eyes: anybody else?

Org-mode version 7.5 (baseline.387.gf9cc.dirty)

(the dirty part is because of some Makefile experiments, nothing to do with=
 timestamps).

> Note that if you use the warning _before_ the repeater,
> then it gets losts:=20
>=20
> <2011-06-28 Tue -1d +1w>

That's not the problem - check the "before" state of the third of Karl's
examples.

>=20
> That because the warning should always be _after_ the repeater:
>=20
> See section 8.3.2 "Repeated tasks" in the manual
>=20
>   "the repeater should come first and the warning period last:
>   `DEADLINE: <2005-10-01 Sat +1m -3d>'."
>=20

Nick