From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20637: incompatible, undocumented change to vc-working-revision Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 03:33:35 +0300 Message-ID: <24135d06-656d-3031-f782-1069ce279347@yandex.ru> References: <6ok2vyzwf9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <08f70cda-44be-0657-e50a-2b2c80d2c21c@yandex.ru> <87mvphnoei.fsf@gmx.de> <874mbawp84.fsf@gmx.de> <878u0llwq6.fsf@gmx.de> <0455367c-8ece-3520-a79e-6b08110e8108@yandex.ru> <87potxwd1u.fsf@gmx.de> <87egacws5x.fsf@gmx.de> <87twj4hdim.fsf@gmx.de> <8a0a80ab-a299-814e-1e18-68ce6e74d9f9@yandex.ru> <87oa9cyzx2.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1460680463 12058 80.91.229.3 (15 Apr 2016 00:34:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 00:34:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20637@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 15 02:34:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aqri7-0000Bz-3l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 02:34:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50036 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqri6-0006j4-IR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 20:34:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48278) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqri3-0006hC-89 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 20:34:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqrhy-0006i6-8e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 20:34:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51713) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqrhy-0006i2-62 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 20:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aqrhy-0006Vk-2N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 20:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 00:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20637 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20637-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20637.146068042525006 (code B ref 20637); Fri, 15 Apr 2016 00:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20637) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2016 00:33:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35817 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aqrhh-0006VG-72 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 20:33:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:34729) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aqrhf-0006V3-Dy for 20637@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 20:33:43 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f66.google.com with SMTP id n3so2004241wmn.1 for <20637@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:33:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9RATt6pxL+bi5Bsl/I2UzZgJQV5VzqKMM3fNUFt+/BA=; b=MrKUnPX5PyLAezaF2oxlkFunCcLdsLrwUEiFzBjb44WdPMTfGkci45Hw8gGyrWyvl+ twBzS2VwuIM/WTOPF+OpptT7pI/uaQA26ysN8mCtgAcOtDq+ub05muhrb0u+Z3XbWbCd IEKeEqce7Eswtu+no/xXz2TYfIDGHshI25IgCRpZnxWVvt2+j9GjajBYFv71lBoUO3YU StUcM4UfIsv2x62ZBR2REOXj3MZZDMYlGO7RFMTL7Io25Cmsuo9nqnRBUbrczs7P+/hR qDB9CxtV0/DV7wTos+BBY9VI/WOrOiZ4OCdmjZSXkd1NbuO60X+0DjmZl27t3DEIzVMh X8wA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9RATt6pxL+bi5Bsl/I2UzZgJQV5VzqKMM3fNUFt+/BA=; b=efJE+dupxScgPfmP4ggBHPqk/aageBLasJscVxoGD3ItR3EqanAxEUyNKUPnokKVLa eVPKSlsgLgFOjbYMMvbXxFXHxd7hZICZYtZpiKUxqjjBOpEDQErdYjJrIcAYP4yBl8D4 IuqSLMU0oWjS4VUmxO7Wg2xigZkAmp4RSfL8VoCjECGiaazebV6rDASFfb99xKTGS5Yz Wn99udYwFyQCM6YH39CqobJw4wGfXZRtZk23aHMapEEtmmbDrodNx4UF5Wy+jBEKnDr7 r/lqvEIMrfoRhms2Sg6oSOO0oGRw86zABpMpbdQ4kKEL1YSjgkj+tn8bzGJePzt7TWA8 TpqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXiqozXECpGOs1hhNEBiGDtwzQ1EV6BajnoxhpdT9pc92oPOfJ3pf72qnZaFan2Kg== X-Received: by 10.194.90.229 with SMTP id bz5mr20073849wjb.143.1460680417929; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:33:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id dj8sm4925578wjc.28.2016.04.14.17.33.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:33:37 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 In-Reply-To: <87oa9cyzx2.fsf@gmx.de> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:116480 Archived-At: On 04/14/2016 06:26 PM, Michael Albinus wrote: > But since ESRs rewrite in fall 2014, there are still several > inconsistencies. Do you mean any of the changes introduced in the rewrite? If so, which ones? > Eric confirmed that in an email to me. So it's not only > bug hunting, a systematic review of the state is needed. Sure, VC has problems, but (vc-state FILE) not always being equal to (vc-state FILE BACKEND) does not seem like the biggest one. It hasn't come up on my radar even once before. > I've started to write systematic tests (up to my limited knowledge), and > I've asked several times in emacs-devel ML for support, but nearly no > response. That's why I'm kinda frustrated. I remember. I'm here now, open to questions and dicussions. I'd like to avoid switching to master myself for the time being, though.