From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: chad Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: indent-region behavior with no region Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:02:16 -0700 Message-ID: <2393DD07-5F6F-41AB-A64E-B4AF6259FE8C@mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364428977 17274 80.91.229.3 (28 Mar 2013 00:02:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:02:57 +0000 (UTC) To: "emacs-devel@gnu.org Development" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 28 01:03:24 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UL0JK-0001Lw-7I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 01:03:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43430 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UL0Iw-0003Yx-7d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:02:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47919) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UL0IQ-00031S-Tu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:02:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UL0IM-0004U8-Ru for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:02:22 -0400 Original-Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-2.mit.edu ([18.9.25.13]:45189) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UL0IM-0004U1-P8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:02:18 -0400 X-AuditID: 1209190d-b7fa66d0000008f6-21-5153888ab4d1 Original-Received: from mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.39]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-2.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 9B.EA.02294.A8883515; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:02:18 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id r2S02HfT011585 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:02:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [10.0.0.184] ([12.132.232.58]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as yandros@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id r2S02E7R016319 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:02:17 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrKIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixG6nrtvVERxocHy6lMXjBU9YHRg92qaZ BTBGcdmkpOZklqUW6dslcGUsuCpecI6povnXQvYGxj6mLkYODgkBE4kzR3S7GDmBTDGJC/fW s4HYQgL7GCXu9TB2MXIB2acZJY5e3M4O4exhkri36TErSDObgAxQhwZIA7OAlsSNfy+ZIGx5 ie1v5zCD2MICehIXF0wF28UrYCUx9TJYOYuAqsTiszsZQWwRAWuJHau/grXyApVf+/aVHeIe WYnXz9+wTGDkm4VkwywkG2YhaVnAyLyKUTYlt0o3NzEzpzg1Wbc4OTEvL7VI10gvN7NELzWl dBMjKLQ4JXl3ML47qHSIUYCDUYmHt0E8OFCINbGsuDL3EKMkB5OSKK81MDCF+JLyUyozEosz 4otKc1KLDzFKcDArifDOqgHK8aYkVlalFuXDpKQ5WJTEea+k3PQXEkhPLEnNTk0tSC2Cycpw cChJ8Ca2AzUKFqWmp1akZeaUIKSZODhBhvMADfcGqeEtLkjMLc5Mh8ifYlSUEueNAUkIgCQy SvPgemGx/4pRHOgVYd4ikCoeYNqA634FNJgJaPDUv/4gg0sSEVJSDYz+nTrrYj+numplVFzs Kqx8V6NdohRvPWvRSU7ZBaFG1Z9Dp05vKpm7bCc75wfRPS31vBPnxSxKkLui2yv06YKUU/0M pa2pKyO6dvkeVPu7drrxLoF3KsbM6+ce/PEsMFuh5rLgzLjbYTNNJ731n3BMbYroWseCe1Gh jMfe8ehdL5pw6bXVweVKLMUZiYZazEXFiQCR0QZr2AIAAA== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 18.9.25.13 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158330 Archived-At: Is there a functional or historical reason for indent-region's behavior when no region is set, or is it simply accidental? In looking at the newish emacs blog http://emacsredux.com/, I found a suggestion to make it indent the buffer if called with no region, which seemed like a reasonable choice. Thanks in advance, ~Chad