From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CEDET merge Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:58:41 -0400 Message-ID: <22haqfibha.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87fw6izq6z.fsf@gnu.org> <87obl6c7dj.fsf@engster.org> <87bogsedna.fsf_-_@engster.org> <87626vd380.fsf@engster.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1349031529 27375 80.91.229.3 (30 Sep 2012 18:58:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 18:58:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org, "Eric M. Ludlam" To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 30 20:58:54 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TIOj5-0006cb-Gz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 20:58:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51571 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIOiz-00055R-Uy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:58:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51810) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIOix-00055J-BK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:58:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIOiw-00034u-Dc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:58:43 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:41854) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIOiw-00034p-Ah for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:58:42 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIOiv-00028I-7s; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:58:41 -0400 X-Spook: fundamentalist United Nations Bosnia industrial espionage X-Ran: 0T&7Nl%STbE=VXO]CWn9%5rd-JOg=,;M{&r)D~'_-doanzWfM@,9fg|!Qf3P7,tD_c-=6` X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <87626vd380.fsf@engster.org> (David Engster's message of "Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:55:59 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153769 Archived-At: David Engster wrote: > Additionally, I've also regenerated the Elisp parsers from the updated > grammar files. This converted some more explicit copyright ranges like > > Copyright (C) 2002-2004, 2007, 2010-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc > > to a simple range like this > > Copyright (C) 2002-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > Is this acceptable? If the former is the true statement, that the latter is not an acceptable alternative, no. If the former was for some reason incorrect and the latter is correct, then obviously it is ok. http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/maintain.html#Copyright-Notices