From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: A Soare Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Release plans Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:04:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <22745878.701461218564286113.JavaMail.www@wwinf4623> Reply-To: alinsoar@voila.fr NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1218564335 776 80.91.229.12 (12 Aug 2008 18:05:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:05:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Emacs Dev \[emacs-devel\]" To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 12 20:06:25 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KSyFp-0001aN-0r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:05:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50808 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KSyEs-0005dJ-Pb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:04:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KSyEm-0005Zp-81 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:04:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KSyEh-0005U0-Nq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:04:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36329 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KSyEh-0005Th-IX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:04:47 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp2.voila.fr ([193.252.22.175]:49798 helo=smtp1.voila.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KSyEh-0003xB-3K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:04:47 -0400 Original-Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf4108.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 2C3F71C00465; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:04:46 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from wwinf4623 (wwinf4623 [10.232.13.47]) by mwinf4108.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1D3221C00462; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:04:46 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20080812180446119.1D3221C00462@mwinf4108.voila.fr X-Originating-IP: [93.112.92.17] X-Wum-Nature: EMAIL-NATURE X-WUM-FROM: |~| X-WUM-TO: |~| X-WUM-CC: |~| X-WUM-REPLYTO: |~| X-me-spamlevel: not-spam X-me-spamrating: 40.000000 X-me-spamcause: OK, (-100)(0000)gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrvdejvddrfeelucetggdotefuucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuoehnohhnvgeqnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102353 Archived-At: > > I told you: everything depends of education. > > No, from my viewpoint emacs is better. > > But in the same time I realise that from their viewpoint other editors = are better. > > I tolerate their education. >=20 > But does not that mean that you say that your education is better? That= =20 > you have learned something that they have not (yet)? The word good-best-better is a kind of recursion in nature. To solve the bugs, I must add to the definition: "best-better-good can be applied to objects that belong to the same space.= One cannot compare 2 objects from different worlds using this word. In the= Kant's language, one says that our mind cannot find a common category in o= rder to apply this word to that category". If you take care about this definition, the loop dissapears. It reduces to = discrimination. If you go on with further this discussion, you make discrim= ination. Everything is relative to this world. A fish cannot say that he le= aves better than a man, and vice versa. >=20 > > Now I see. Voila. >=20 > It would be nice if you find a way to fix the line wrapping (and told=20 > the developers of the software that is malfunctioning of course). >=20 You did not understand. The web site where I have my pretty and most lovely= mail account add this banner. ____________________________________________________ Avant de prendre le volant, rep=C3=A9rez votre itin=C3=A9raire et visualise= z le trafic ! http://itineraire.voila.fr/itineraire.html