From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: raman@google.com (T.V Raman) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: Compiled code in Emacs-26 will fail in Emacs-25 if use pcase [was: Add new bytecode op `switch' for implementing branch tables.] Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:50:21 -0800 Message-ID: <22703.8413.359650.67917@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> References: <1b07c68a-873e-83c8-246d-423bc83a3881@gmail.com> <83y3xg4ldw.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1487872277 18297 195.159.176.226 (23 Feb 2017 17:51:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:51:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cpitclaudel@gmail.com, tino.calancha@gmail.com, vibhavp@gmail.com, raman@google.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: drew.adams@oracle.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 23 18:51:12 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cgxXd-0003DT-G7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 18:50:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60054 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cgxXj-0006V1-Dj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 12:51:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34675) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cgxXA-0006Uv-3G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 12:50:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cgxX6-0003Ax-UI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 12:50:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pg0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22a]:33063) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cgxX6-0003Ak-N8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 12:50:24 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pg0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id z128so17630339pgb.0 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:50:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:date:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references; bh=6t3qzyUgVczFOdSK3bUpYfSr90XQ4RneuevPb2EfI1I=; b=IjjuapMrSTE59zYB4w/nXfLVjrEDSW5GyLhETuHwLj83EUm2MYWD1azmCArTnawhcd fu88x7CTasLh2XGvEPGyhhP3upgNiE69MGX3kuVrej/0HrZa+dUTvbUhMgGoy0TLEC/8 fEVB2GsxQgcDD9GfCDdediHqW4qBJWAjD+WvFyc10jwkGYfqbjVgyqYRVQO3rvKK2FJy R8gAipnBujsAwxUMqgZAeJAOnl65aAJfZFRADS9vCHGH76/SvPqnb4fYJdeRMsrd/IuA k/sz55pQfAvqEX+skWD1zT52/6mBUb49iTAlcPOXCyKRJLBkQX/8OCXLR7+OR5E3q/yK sD+A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references; bh=6t3qzyUgVczFOdSK3bUpYfSr90XQ4RneuevPb2EfI1I=; b=NMQAj1G3Kor+IDOcEVVp52KiDu3RZ7idaM+RLbk5mKphNMw05x4KtSzpk3LWECskfX T8MceSs1eB47c+THyyD271VUcyKnOxL1aOAaUAEhe1G7h3S5Ea0bOQKEv3DICBmRrlxy KHDx/O9Z8VS9AC78mTZgokU5Bu5dMNJJAchZvZK5ZJtJJzgx8PjvLaQTIQUMzGVgxIvj DmaTideocQIkY0jvuUWrWOXjqSw9452ZdutIfbqzbM22Qvfa9cC2qtMkcAkpXdjKc1Ks UZPM+RT0e3bcvlPp/BZCOo8RDE+bge889H+kiLj3u3xMKzAMmAvFPY4D2QhdzFpn+kNb WJ0g== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lv6+ti528ew4T8EpNF+oTacLmPYRCtF6AFr9UaBXEA4/PEHj6gPCeyItB2c0A05Fm4 X-Received: by 10.84.128.8 with SMTP id 8mr22668879pla.24.1487872223261; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:50:23 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from retriever.mtv.corp.google.com ([100.98.8.138]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n80sm10956075pfb.111.2017.02.23.09.50.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:50:22 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by retriever.mtv.corp.google.com (Postfix, from userid 13930) id 850F41A0F9C; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:50:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.1.1 under 26.0.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212551 Archived-At: Really? What should we be using, and when was defsubst deprecated? Drew Adams writes: > > With code compiled with lexical scoping, defsubst forms appear to > > behave differently when compiled vs evaled > > We should no longer be using defsubst anyway... -- --