From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: kifer@cs.sunysb.edu (Michael Kifer) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ediff and coding systems Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:50:09 -0400 Message-ID: <22573.1193025009@cs.sunysb.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193025035 13997 80.91.229.12 (22 Oct 2007 03:50:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 03:50:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 22 05:50:35 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IjoJB-0004cG-HK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 05:50:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IjoJ3-0000Ee-N0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:50:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IjoJ0-0000Cv-PH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:50:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IjoIz-0000AZ-2c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:50:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IjoIy-0000AM-UY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:50:16 -0400 Original-Received: from sbcs.cs.sunysb.edu ([130.245.1.15]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IjoIu-0004JH-81; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:50:12 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (compserv1 [130.245.1.44]) by sbcs.cs.sunysb.edu (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l9M3o84I001500; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:50:08 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1]:10025 (kiferserv [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FDAA8B771; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:50:10 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: Message from Dan Nicolaescu of "Sun, 21 Oct 2007 19:08:39 PDT." <200710220208.l9M28dDG001750@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.3+cvs; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 23.0.50 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (1203?) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:81426 Archived-At: > kifer@cs.sunysb.edu (Michael Kifer) writes: > > > > kifer@cs.sunysb.edu (Michael Kifer) writes: > > > > > > > I am using 23.0.50 - the current CVS version. > > > > > > I can reproduce it with a version checked out this morning from CVS > > > trunk and one that is about 1 week old, I don't have anything older > > > than that. > > > > > > Is your version up to date? > > > > Yes - just updated it this morning. > > I don't have any other ideas of what to try... I dunno either. If somebody can come up with a reproducible test then I could try to see what is going on. > Not related to this, but could you please look at these byte compile > warnings for viper-cmd.el? > > In viper-next-line-carefully: > viper-cmd.el:2792:19:Warning: `next-line' used from Lisp code > That command is designed for interactive use only > > In viper-next-line: > viper-cmd.el:3091:41:Warning: `next-line' used from Lisp code > That command is designed for interactive use only > > In viper-previous-line: > viper-cmd.el:3134:41:Warning: `previous-line' used from Lisp code > That command is designed for interactive use only > > Most similar warnings have been fixed in CVS, but for the above is not > obvious what to do. ok > In end of data: > viper-cmd.el:5099:1:Warning: the function `viper-heading-end' might > not be defined at runtime. No idea why the above shows up. Could it be a compiler bug? > > This one is strange > > > viper-cmd.el:5099:1:Warning: the following functions are not known to > be defined: quail-input-method, quail-start-translation, > event-to-character, character-to-event, viper-iconify, key-press-event-p, event-key, > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > These should be optimized out by the byte compiler. No idea. The above are mostly XEmacs functions. > Also viper-xemacs-p is about as long as (featurep 'emacs) and as > readable. Why not replace it? Most similar macros have been replaced > in CVS. I do not really care, but see no reason why waste time on this one.