From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Adrian Robert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch? Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:12:43 -0400 Message-ID: <22248D70-EFF1-431E-B724-2407BC5572F0@gmail.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1248664419 20743 80.91.229.12 (27 Jul 2009 03:13:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 03:13:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel devel To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 27 05:13:33 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MVGeb-0001Ve-0o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:13:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53241 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MVGea-0003P0-7W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:13:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MVGe9-0003DO-Vu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:13:06 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MVGe4-0003BW-Ui for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:13:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52728 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MVGe4-0003BR-OE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:13:00 -0400 Original-Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.92.150]:51039) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MVGe3-0002qw-Us for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:13:00 -0400 Original-Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so1808104qwf.24 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:12:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:cc:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=y1owU0CJgR8Xq+SXD8RLZCEhHp+thJU62qZCIBdYAN4=; b=MFfoXNnw0DIb8CDF+3bvZNqNsydQc1Is9wRCrxVtDnDwReSKWO5C0ePEGM3YqQQDAU t5tXmKWY40J54iQlyyg8MNDx/AJ/8G3KGct8/7d1anxnvYZaqkhJTq7J7+aoIQpukNU/ WkH57jhR/GVAyKLsHuqwZAFJ4lFhX9wjjWywY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=R+wjuMTfRghGQh0Fxl/n8Qk/J2pktQJkceVZ5q02pfNCVXuebmA9aOCluVxgJEzRfh KpmFSaqohmbcQoXgDxmoduWA3UWxnoW+4TctGBj5wTUuijjPe4ZoZBCq/8vx313bjiSE 6D85eQxUS4Zc6N/JqdegxH8AIxC+40rRO3K84= Original-Received: by 10.224.67.207 with SMTP id s15mr5539345qai.128.1248664377918; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:12:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?10.0.1.3? (dpc6745214221.direcpc.com [67.45.214.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm9907634qwb.30.2009.07.26.20.12.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:12:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:113197 Archived-At: On Jul 26, 2009, at 8:35 PM, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 07:22:55 -0400, Adrian Robert >>>>> > said: > >> ns-set-background-alpha: The implementation you just removed was >> superior to that for (set-frame-parameter nil 'alpha ##): it does >> not alter the alpha of the titlebar, scrollbars, modeline, or text. >> This makes it usable, instead of a curiosity. > > The implementation of the "superior" transparency has an annoying > glitch that it sometimes leaves "ghost letters" of the previous > contents on screen. I was not aware this issue was still present. I had noticed it at one point a couple of years ago but thought it had been resolved once some indirectly-related issues with text rendering and GUI updates had been ironed out. It's possible it returned after later changes in those areas.