From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Elena Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Are there any problems with lexical-let or other cl-macros??? Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:56:23 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <21f39695-3a96-4c8e-a2d9-3f62f6188727@t10g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> References: <5ad73987-3540-44a3-b4b1-b83c92d92526@q23g2000vba.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291847941 27945 80.91.229.12 (8 Dec 2010 22:39:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 22:39:01 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 08 23:38:57 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PQSf3-0004oR-1T for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:38:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60572 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PQSep-0002V8-82 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 17:38:43 -0500 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!postnews.google.com!t10g2000yqg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 14 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.96.190.244 Original-X-Trace: posting.google.com 1279612584 15407 127.0.0.1 (20 Jul 2010 07:56:24 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:56:24 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: t10g2000yqg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.96.190.244; posting-account=AFCLjAoAAABJAOf_HjgEEEi3ty-lG5m2 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6,gzip(gfe) Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:179865 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:76142 Archived-At: On Jul 19, 10:44=A0pm, Stefan Monnier wrote: > In which sense does lexical-let leak memory? >From http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?EmacsLisp : "Note that variables bound with lexical-let are never released, even if they are never used. Try (loop for i from 1 to 100000 collect (lexical-let ((x i)) '())) and watch it eat memory. So making infinity (ZeroOneInfinity) lexical variables is out of the question except for very small values of infinity."