From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Package initialization Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:59:25 +0900 Message-ID: <21933.57277.184994.975734@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87twt1dmxu.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <21931.51113.826895.663216@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <21932.20274.646021.600004@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1437458382 28887 80.91.229.3 (21 Jul 2015 05:59:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 05:59:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Artur Malabarba , emacs-devel To: Helmut Eller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 21 07:59:34 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZHQaT-0002Dz-O9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 07:59:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58070 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZHQaT-0008Uv-2g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 01:59:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37962) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZHQaQ-0008Ue-Fw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 01:59:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZHQaN-0002Ba-Az for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 01:59:30 -0400 Original-Received: from shako.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.161]:48919) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZHQaN-0002BQ-0b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 01:59:27 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shako.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F2E91C38D6; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:59:25 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4F9A111EF83; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:59:25 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta34) "kale" ffb5abc8dc4e XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 130.158.97.161 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:188027 Archived-At: Helmut Eller writes: > I think we rather keep control of key bindings in our own hands; > especially as we don't always agree with the Emacs maintainers > (like the bindings for M-./M-, until recently etc). Since I don't know what those do in slime, perhaps you misunderstand my point about keybindings in lisp-mode: I meant only the keybindings that would allow slime users to invoke the most common functionality conveniently. Then once they do that, slime-setup would be called implicitly, and all keybindings would become available.