From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: More metaproblem Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 08:51:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <217e5134-af21-4481-a3af-657ed0340bf9@default> References: <<20141203142859.24393.98673@vcs.savannah.gnu.org>> <> <> <<20141203192721.GE12748@thyrsus.com>> <<547F6774.50700@cs.ucla.edu>> <<838uio5vjw.fsf@gnu.org>> <<20141203211447.GB15111@thyrsus.com>> <<871toge5zw.fsf@floss.red-bean.com>> <<83388v6hsq.fsf@gnu.org>> <<87egsftgd5.fsf@ktab.red-bean.com>> <<83egsf3yci.fsf@gnu.org>> <<87iohq6nvn.fsf@ktab.red-bean.com>> <<85bnnhkuep.fsf@stephe-leake.org>> <> <<857fy4ipsd.fsf@stephe-leake.org>> <> <<85y4qjdsg0.fsf@stephe-leake.org>> <> <<83vblmxhg8.fsf@gnu.org>> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418057552 6053 80.91.229.3 (8 Dec 2014 16:52:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 16:52:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 08 17:52:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy1Xq-0000Yj-Pr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 17:52:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34926 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy1Xq-0000vB-4H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 11:52:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52412) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy1XV-0000u4-6P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 11:52:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy1XM-0001UE-E6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 11:52:01 -0500 Original-Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:26820) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy1XC-0001TK-Nz; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 11:51:42 -0500 Original-Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id sB8Gpell011725 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 8 Dec 2014 16:51:41 GMT Original-Received: from userz7021.oracle.com (userz7021.oracle.com [156.151.31.85]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sB8GpdMr021054 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 8 Dec 2014 16:51:39 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0017.oracle.com (abhmp0017.oracle.com [141.146.116.23]) by userz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sB8GpcGa021031; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 16:51:38 GMT In-Reply-To: <<83vblmxhg8.fsf@gnu.org>> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.8.2 (807160) [OL 12.0.6691.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 141.146.126.69 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:179410 Archived-At: > > Developers are users. Some users are developers. There is no > > reason not to provide such info for users in general (IMHO). > > Especially if we want to encourage users to contribute. >=20 > I suggest to put this issue on hold for a moment. We don't yet have > the contents of that file in its final form. I suggest to wait > until we do, and decide whether to move it into some manual later. > There's no rush. OK; sounds good. Thanks for considering it, at least.