In data martedì 27 agosto 2024 14:22:16 CEST, Eli Zaretskii ha scritto:
> > From: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
> > Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 20:13:52 -0700
> > Cc: eliz@gnu.org,
> > 
> >  vincenzo.pupillo@unimi.it
> > 
> > Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> writes:
> > > X-Debbugs-CC: eliz@gnu.org <mailto:eliz@gnu.org>,
> > > vincenzo.pupillo@unimi.it
> > > 
> > > Should we add a custom option that controls whether to enable doxygen
> > > support in c-ts-mode/c++-ts-mode/java-ts-mode?
> > > 
> > > Technically this isn’t a problem, since the doxygen support is only
> > > enabled if there’s doxygen grammar on the system. But many people
> > > (me) might install a grammar bundle that includes dozens of
> > > grammars for convenience. Then the doxygen support would turn on when
> > > the user doesn’t really intend to use it.
> > > 
> > > I propose we add custom options like c-ts-mode-enable-doxygen and set it
> > > to t by default, so the default behavior is still to enable doxygen
> > > support when the grammar for it exists, but people who don’t want to pay
> > > for it can turn it off by setting the option to nil.
> > > 
> > > Yuan
> > 
> > Eli, WDYT?
> 
> I'm okay with such an option, but it should be careful to check
> whether the corresponding grammar library is available, and offer a
> user-friendly diagnostic if not.

Try to take a look at this patch. Is it okay?

Vincenzo