From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22172: 25.1.50; Wishlist: There should be a way to say to Emacs that is should rescale all images with a certain factor Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 18:46:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <21432be5-61e0-4f0e-8f39-e9b66a414e07@default> References: <47io40i0ph.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <877fifya6c.fsf@gnus.org> <878u2vxmlm.fsf@web.de> <87oabqltlt.fsf@gnus.org> <87fux28xit.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454986044 1963 80.91.229.3 (9 Feb 2016 02:47:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 02:47:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22172@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 09 03:47:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aSyKc-0001A5-Md for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 03:47:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51096 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSyKc-0003WR-08 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:47:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55421) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSyKY-0003WF-3z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:47:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSyKU-0008Bs-UT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:47:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51636) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSyKU-0008BF-QV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aSyKU-0005kh-EH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:47:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 02:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22172 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22172-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22172.145498598721187 (code B ref 22172); Tue, 09 Feb 2016 02:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22172) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2016 02:46:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60777 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aSyJv-0005VP-5P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:46:27 -0500 Original-Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:30941) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aSyJt-0005PE-59 for 22172@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:46:25 -0500 Original-Received: from userv0022.oracle.com (userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id u192kI1H031920 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 9 Feb 2016 02:46:18 GMT Original-Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by userv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u192kHIM016369 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 9 Feb 2016 02:46:17 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0004.oracle.com (abhmp0004.oracle.com [141.146.116.10]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u192kG3k023921; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 02:46:17 GMT In-Reply-To: <87fux28xit.fsf@gnus.org> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9 (901082) [OL 12.0.6691.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:112775 Archived-At: > I've now added the commands, but not documented this yet, because we > haven't decided on keystrokes. These should be global bindings, I > guess? We could also have local keymaps for the image objects > themselves... That would mean that insert-image would also put a keymap > on each image it inserts. >=20 > And in that case we could "steal" very basic keystrokes, like "-" and > "+". But that may be kinda yucky. And surprising. >=20 > But I kinda like the local keymap idea. These commands would only be > valid pretty seldom (i.e., when you're on an image), so it feels strange > to occupy a global key binding. >=20 > So... opinions? Here's an opinion: Do not bind the commands to any keys. 10 minutes after defining the commands you want Emacs to dedicate keys to them? And global keys, at that? Let users bind them if they like. In a few years users and Emacs Dev can take stock of the situation and consider whether such commands should be bound by default, and if so, where. If you want to put a key on an image, that might be OK. If you want to add a key to image-mode, that might be OK. But beyond that, there is no reason to jump the gun on this. If the commands are super useful they will soon enough be bound to keys by users, and users will themselves suggest which keys might be most important.