From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Marshall Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17046: 24.3.50; On startup emacs frame has no minibuffer or windows decorations Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:14:00 +0000 Message-ID: <21299.9976.659681.339493@capuchin.co.uk> References: <87bnx1me40.fsf@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.19864.25566.342047@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.22701.448897.930196@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.26536.10078.165484@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.32260.291274.364373@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.42153.768572.7270@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.46373.182060.426183@capuchin.co.uk> <21297.11355.705621.35886@capuchin.co.uk> <21297.25588.373807.661407@capuchin.co.uk> <53319957.8080102@gmx.at> <83y4zyz3br.fsf@gnu.org> <21299.2416.520654.420180@capuchin.co.uk> <838urwzvyw.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395861258 30030 80.91.229.3 (26 Mar 2014 19:14:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:14:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17046@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 26 20:14:27 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WStHF-0000qD-Q5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 20:14:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49853 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WStHF-0007IX-Bp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:14:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43779) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WStH7-0007IE-6l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:14:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WStH1-00014D-D1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:14:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50161) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WStH1-000144-A0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:14:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WStH0-00008Q-G2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Marshall Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17046 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17046-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17046.1395861239498 (code B ref 17046); Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17046) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2014 19:13:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51343 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WStGw-00007w-4N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:13:58 -0400 Original-Received: from know-smtprelay-omc-10.server.virginmedia.net ([80.0.253.74]:53805) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WStGt-00007n-V0 for 17046@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:13:57 -0400 Original-Received: from capuchin.co.uk ([86.1.25.150]) by know-smtprelay-10-imp with bizsmtp id iKDt1n04N3EJRsN01KDuux; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:13:55 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [86.1.25.150] X-Spam: 0 X-Authority: v=2.1 cv=Qfbov6rv c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=M7xYXag64YmbaeErs/qbeg==:117 a=M7xYXag64YmbaeErs/qbeg==:17 a=oWwmHH8kAAAA:8 a=ZoWAZ9ph8JIA:10 a=aGljky2k91gA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=N_xDZ8MAqG-espKIBpIA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=ii61gXl28gQA:10 Original-Received: from poulenc.faure (poulenc [192.168.0.9]) by capuchin.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86949DCA9; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:13:52 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.50.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:87424 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > My idea was what Robert did. So it did work ;-) > > Oh :-) > I'm glad I put in both options! > But that's equivalent to just skipping all the hoopla with > tool-bar-lines. You're setting it to 0, then to the correct value, and > then modifying the frame. > > > Is it for some reason unworkable to have the size change after all the > > rest? > > Presumably, that would break the fix for bug#14795. > > OTOH, though the bug still real, i.e., > > (modify-frame-parameters (make-frame) '((height . X))) > > and > > (make-frame '((height . X))) > > give frames of different size, now I cannot reproduce the problem when > restoring frames with frameset-restore *without* my workaround. > > I think there's been some changes related to frames and the like, so > it is possible that the workaround can simply be removed and this > problem just disappears. We would still have a bug with GTK builds and > tool-bar-lines = 0, but it would be of much lesser impact. > > Allow me a few hours to test things thoroughly. > Should I be updating my pull from bzr? (if only to keep in sync with you) Robert -- Robert Marshall