From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: #+begin_example broken when #+begin_src included inside? Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:46:22 -0400 Message-ID: <21168.1307925982@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <4DF54C22.6040606@ccbr.umn.edu> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33524) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QVvIX-0001bW-JJ for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:46:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QVvIW-0007H8-3L for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:46:33 -0400 Received: from vms173009pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.9]:42885) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QVvIV-00078h-Ty for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:46:32 -0400 Received: from alphaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106]) by vms173009.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LMP006HAE5AN030@vms173009.mailsrvcs.net> for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:46:28 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: Message from Erik Iverson of "Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:30:42 CDT." <4DF54C22.6040606@ccbr.umn.edu> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Erik Iverson Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Erik Iverson wrote: > Can anyone confirm the following: > > Export the following org-mode markup to, say, latex > > * a headline > here's an example of a code block ... > #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE > #+BEGIN_SRC
> > #+END_SRC > #END_EXAMPLE > > > I get (only relevant portion included): > > \section{a headline} > \label{sec-1} > > here's an example of a code block \ldots{} > \lstset{language=} > \begin{lstlisting} > > \end{lstlisting} > > > So, somehow the begin_src block is getting interpreted as such even > though it's in a begin_example block...I of course want the whole of > the text inside the example to simply be in the output verbatim. Did a > bug creep in perhaps? > I can certainly confirm that: I reported it a week ago - see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/42546 Nick