From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Roland Winkler" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14876: 24.3; load-path and environment variable EMACSLOADPATH Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 20:16:22 -0500 Message-ID: <20964.40678.246559.282930@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <87d2qjphto.fsf@gnu.org> <52vc4b7837.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20964.33174.309621.114986@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20964.38139.990086.220391@gargle.gargle.HOWL> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1373937431 11282 80.91.229.3 (16 Jul 2013 01:17:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 01:17:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14876@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 16 03:17:11 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uytt8-0002g0-Qd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 03:17:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35242 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uytt7-0006Qe-OI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:17:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43859) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uytt2-0006QZ-Tn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:17:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uytt0-0008LW-NG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:17:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34485) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uytt0-0008LQ-Ju for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Uytt0-00075X-1a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Roland Winkler" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 01:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14876 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14876-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14876.137393738927180 (code B ref 14876); Tue, 16 Jul 2013 01:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14876) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jul 2013 01:16:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57034 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UytsS-00074I-0a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:16:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:36628 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UytsP-00074A-SX for 14876@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:16:26 -0400 Original-Received: from adsl-68-77-23-184.dsl.emhril.ameritech.net ([68.77.23.184]:35752 helo=regnitz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UytsO-0008Cj-Ss; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:16:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.2 trial under 24.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:76383 Archived-At: On Mon Jul 15 2013 Glenn Morris wrote: > Great! Looks like you should just be able to set (AM_)ELCFLAGS to -L ... > in recent automake. With automake 1.14, by default, the compilation of lisp code uses only the emacs option -batch. It does not include the option -q. I do not know whether this is reasonable. ...When I think about it, this might even be considered a regression compared with the old automake shell script elisp-comp which did use the option -q. Should I send a bug report to the automake maintainers about this?