From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Roland Winkler" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13668: 24.2.93; strike-through in org mode Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 07:00:39 -0600 Message-ID: <20759.39415.151607.366601@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <87fw153vsd.fsf@gnu.org> <87halkn6bz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360502338 17725 80.91.229.3 (10 Feb 2013 13:18:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 13:18:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13668@debbugs.gnu.org To: Bastien Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 10 14:19:19 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U4WoQ-00021Q-LZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:19:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46854 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4Wo7-0000UE-BJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:18:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48219) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4WXg-0005rr-V8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:02:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4WXY-0000t1-UT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:01:56 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42854) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4WXT-0000rj-Kx; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:01:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4WXh-0001Vr-LV; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:02:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Roland Winkler" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 13:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13668 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,org-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13668-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13668.13605012655748 (code B ref 13668); Sun, 10 Feb 2013 13:02:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13668) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2013 13:01:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48317 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4WWm-0001Uf-Vd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:01:05 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:55625) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4WWk-0001UY-Lw for 13668@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:01:03 -0500 Original-Received: from adsl-68-77-17-140.dsl.emhril.ameritech.net ([68.77.17.140]:47869 helo=regnitz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4WWT-0004H2-9f; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:00:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87halkn6bz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> X-Mailer: VM 8.2 trial under 24.2.93.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:70994 Archived-At: On Sun Feb 10 2013 Bastien wrote: > > But it appears to me that this feature could use a > > more sophisticated regexp matcher. Note that the 5th and 6th line > > are not striked through. > > Because the space isn't allowed within +...+ fontified constructs. There are spaces both between the 2nd and 3rd line, and between the 5th and 6th line. -- Possibly, the regexp matcher could distinguish in a smarter way between word constituents and no word constituents. > (setq org-fontify-emphasized-text nil) Thanks, I'll use that. > > The org info node on structural markup > > elements does not mention such a possibility. > > Mhh.. yes, I'll perhaps update the manual, or just add a Worg > FAQ for this. Why put this in a separate FAQ? Aren't the info pages the first source of information for such things? Roland