From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: raman@google.com (T.V Raman) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs: hanging in redisplay code? Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 13:48:40 -0700 Message-ID: <20589.63016.232173.391381@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> References: <20589.39640.643682.851351@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <838vbm80z4.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1349401831 23769 80.91.229.3 (5 Oct 2012 01:50:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 01:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, raman@google.com To: eliz@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 05 03:50:33 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TJx3d-0005tv-16 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 03:50:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44788 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJsYr-0003ZW-Hj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 17:02:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41032) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJsM0-0004Cg-RU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 16:49:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJsLZ-00041y-Vk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 16:49:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yh0-f73.google.com ([209.85.213.73]:45435) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJsLZ-00041Y-RH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 16:48:41 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yh0-f73.google.com with SMTP id i33so67062yhi.0 for ; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:48:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer; bh=nBgi+7yoQ+7qsYZ59ewN6K0QQLCyaMYD8or4eJL0Ly4=; b=YsRhnxuMfEWSrLqcNdeGssw8tYUIIw5XwqLt8ENS+5M3FWVXuUPfWF3eqQzL3HYKZ9 qNzYHFXJxWgnL2kPlz4mGo8lKPfyH39N8gYZIOc6B8Gd6FSoccvAulNP2f8VHOkzwR0+ T1kPgYvAMoWlLYsxk18BWf9uPY9W0hubOrd96Ir7L3p26ICrIZVfgn0sEy95nDoizXHR dcB/KtBoioRfZpZcKuaMjxgF7ODcWK23KUIE6L+0E5i/oOQa9vN0MHohL9dAmwKeLf+u /mtnlbeUv4sXq5nRTB8EvMd55Jjfwv91MeKnlg5nHU8HiuaAKp3FhCzfK8uiAMxJLe9K Wmsw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=nBgi+7yoQ+7qsYZ59ewN6K0QQLCyaMYD8or4eJL0Ly4=; b=WyiZLGzUF+wHdzUngcwp9X/aIJTa4WjuKGlE3ddoQUC3l0T+DpcBF2DWoQp0ZSOcaB LdvNqBwCD+fW1irfdj/gaH/kpg8qLlP9artTAt0fNa1HuYKhbJolGVXetwF01x3M+6hp 3sx0OEoZu2hXIgS/396SNtVrVl/j4dHQViJvLQfS5ATnYYzJCnwFKe+iYepHt6Quiblq Co4RvsULgt52+WrQBT1s3GaO5f8oyT9YOLRbftxDbtpUSNKkTOcosQHVCi+gHMXpZDvC OZ+ZfQIVZ47E3B1vUjeESCOPP1pX1la894AkIOITHRa6NK4BeYYWpkQu0luifTFAYx9g AL/w== Original-Received: by 10.236.91.229 with SMTP id h65mr4813662yhf.24.1349383720925; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:48:40 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from wpzn4.hot.corp.google.com (216-239-44-65.google.com [216.239.44.65]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b7si1387916yhj.1.2012.10.04.13.48.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA); Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:48:40 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from retriever.mtv.corp.google.com (retriever.mtv.corp.google.com [172.22.77.246]) by wpzn4.hot.corp.google.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5841E005A; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 13:48:40 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by retriever.mtv.corp.google.com (Postfix, from userid 13930) id 6C41BC1980; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 13:48:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <838vbm80z4.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.1.1 under 24.2.50.2 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmvETke4H1cJRqf/+07yFVfJb9X6xv+vDfaHOX5YsV55FRnja28nFdCmLENE1ArXYYqZ6+4nzboNWx4iazToxeD6HjciuFmqho4nc7WmbW0CgeJoTWASYY1+6ZVA09mqt+kfKWuMU6z+jTIMfi9z3dgu3la/v+Y5Imt2y0fQYMgqRQpiB87hBjWDrNq55BlUsn7DvBS X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.213.73 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 17:02:23 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154035 Archived-At: about 100+ triggered it for me on my home machine --- 32bit Ubuntu Jaunty -- Eli Zaretskii writes: > > Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 07:19:04 -0700 > > From: "T. V. Raman" > > > > After last night's update from git, emacs has become *really* > > slow in things like filename completion. Turning on toggle debug > > on quit shows the following backtrace: > > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (quit) > > redisplay_internal\ \(C\ function\)() > > I don't see any slowdown, FWIW. How many files do you have in a > directory where you see slower completion?