From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Samuel Wales Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: why "undo the undo" is not equivalent to redo Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:01:34 -0700 Message-ID: <20524da70911231201v4db758fbrce698454d94e2669@mail.gmail.com> References: <74mmt6-629.ln1@invalid.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259006538 32625 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2009 20:02:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:02:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: stan Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 23 21:02:08 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NCf6s-0008JD-Vi for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:02:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36014 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NCf6s-0006lq-FX for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:02:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NCf6V-0006lR-Q1 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:01:43 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NCf6R-0006ig-7d for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:01:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40732 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NCf6R-0006iK-03 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:01:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f213.google.com ([209.85.220.213]:48384) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NCf6Q-0000uy-DZ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:01:38 -0500 Original-Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so6608106fxm.8 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:01:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Uq18Rn87PdBG3vnHHqNEtuztXJ56CYzTCMo+iVYvV3k=; b=nPqMMSKzKhcccQUUH45qfOTZ1KPZemZ5HJguyCiochGC0NlsVpdvQecZRB2kry+Nkl fbL/2bg7G4tv0kGSjl/KAWZbJUuNUgU0vRlCmGVisZ3t8Ay8Q3Rsyf8FJdHekEH2k7Se 2KWUMBJB3FTjffncalraD+l+tsXjYLZVtCLEg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=HwLo8y/v81II2y2l97BaszjTiFAymMoZbS41blLhwP0oChyinOtfuW1xSjMcVEzAxP IbAYa+pwpiLZa1z/0KDU1VgWEm/CqBqLCjOSdylt7WgAOpdZ5Os2vsn0zpCP0znRS43Y K3fEgIP2ZrUSVbx6a01QgUhf4Gbd9J9n7VLtY= Original-Received: by 10.239.196.81 with SMTP id u17mr492028hbi.165.1259006495336; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:01:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <74mmt6-629.ln1@invalid.net> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:70058 Archived-At: Hi Stan, > Your post seems to be trying to convince versus educate. Either way, type 1 undoers have an example to try to see what redoers are on about. They can make up their own minds. If you weren't educated or convinced, then the post was not for you.