From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Roland Winkler" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11985: 24.1; fit-window-to-buffer does not grab whole frame Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 17:59:02 -0500 Message-ID: <20500.28342.516245.729689@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <87obnc5l09.fsf@gnu.org> <5007E486.7090202@gmx.at> <20488.13978.807457.302232@lukas.physics.niu.edu> <500A8C00.10001@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1343516405 29099 80.91.229.3 (28 Jul 2012 23:00:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 23:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11985@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 29 01:00:05 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SvFzQ-0006yL-V5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 01:00:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57224 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SvFzO-0003kg-Q8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:00:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42426) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SvFzM-0003kO-CD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:00:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SvFzL-0001EZ-CL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:00:00 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37777) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SvFzL-0001EV-8t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 18:59:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SvG6B-0007i9-4R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:07:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Roland Winkler" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 23:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11985 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11985-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11985.134351677329577 (code B ref 11985); Sat, 28 Jul 2012 23:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11985) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jul 2012 23:06:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47323 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SvG5M-0007gz-Ql for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:06:13 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:45812) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SvG5K-0007gs-Ek for 11985@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:06:11 -0400 Original-Received: from pchdb00005.uni-regensburg.de ([132.199.129.10]:36389 helo=regnitz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SvFyT-0006Yc-2g; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 18:59:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <500A8C00.10001@gmx.at> X-Mailer: VM 8.2 trial under 24.1.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:62541 Archived-At: On Sat Jul 21 2012 martin rudalics wrote: > I have no strong opinion on this and never managed to understand > how the old window resize routines worked. What about the version > I attached? If necessary, I can get more aggressive ;-) I am sorry, this goes much beyond what I feel confident to comment on. I got into this when working on BBDB. This uses Electric-pop-up-window. With Emacs 24.1 this function does not behave anymore as expected. Electric-pop-up-window calls fit-window-to-buffer which calls enlarge-window. In the meanwhile I learnt from Stefan (bug#11983) that it's probably best for BBDB (and possibly other packages too) to get rid of all the Electric-* stuff. So I have not much an opinion with respect to fit-window-to-buffer, and there is yet less I could say about enlarge-window. Anyway, thanks for looking into this!