From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Madhu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62135: xterm.c: (x_set_offset) Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2024 18:11:46 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <20240401.181146.1996160877381275609.enometh@meer.net> References: <20230312.065843.1304315041062918300.enometh@meer.net> <87y1o2ba50.fsf@yahoo.com> <20230325.195034.1474281229503255405.enometh@meer.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14597"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 62135@debbugs.gnu.org To: luangruo@yahoo.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 01 14:43:26 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rrH0Y-0003gk-2A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2024 14:43:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rrH08-00044i-NF; Mon, 01 Apr 2024 08:43:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rrH07-00043s-IB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2024 08:42:59 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rrH07-0002lw-A7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2024 08:42:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rrH09-0003wD-W7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2024 08:43:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Madhu Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2024 12:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62135 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62135-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62135.171197532515069 (code B ref 62135); Mon, 01 Apr 2024 12:43:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62135) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2024 12:42:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49798 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rrGzE-0003uy-LS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2024 08:42:05 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp0.ctinetworks.com ([205.166.61.207]:43838) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rrGz9-0003uQ-6j for 62135@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2024 08:42:03 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [117.254.38.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: enometh@meer.net) by smtp0.ctinetworks.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C4C7306F08A; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 08:41:43 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20230325.195034.1474281229503255405.enometh@meer.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.9 on Emacs 30.0.50 X-ctinetworks-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ctinetworks-MailScanner-ID: 0C4C7306F08A.A184D X-ctinetworks-VirusCheck: Found to be clean X-ctinetworks-Watermark: 1712839310.25564@ul4UeGbOM/doFSlzh9VWSw X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:282473 Archived-At: [I hope the context is available upthread on the debbugs] I took another look at the problem with wayfire: The call to XMoveWindow in x_set_offset is what's scuttling it. XMoveWindow gets called with 0,0, wayfire thinks the window is self-positioned, and refuses to further touch the co-ordinates. I think that call to XMoveWindow should be protected by a conditional: ``` if (change_gravity != 0) XMoveWindow (FRAME_X_DISPLAY (f), FRAME_OUTER_WINDOW (f), modified_left, modified_top); ``` so we avoid calling XMoveWindow even before the frame is mapped for the first time. Right?