From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Add a configure option for NATIVE_FULL_AOT? Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 15:32:33 +0200 Message-ID: <20210818133233.GA3470@tuxteam.de> References: <834kbo6xm5.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgtg3x4i.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <83zgtg57jv.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1er3oqr.fsf@igel.home> <83lf4z6hh0.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsv75w43.fsf@gnu.org> <20210818073349.GC18126@tuxteam.de> <835yw354rb.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="liOOAslEiF7prFVr" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22350"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 18 15:34:54 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mGLiX-0005TV-DX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 15:34:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46094 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mGLiW-0006zs-Fe for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:34:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45660) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mGLgM-0002YT-Sf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:32:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:48276) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mGLgK-000159-4I; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:32:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=ULRywVYYAIOnVSHLDz3VOfPVxnhebT4hvMM0+0F2/p0=; b=IJu/GAYHLW0dogTIDsHwEtSC8dNmz1JksLNrCT0FlTO4jNGI6qV99aJS7b3pP78FxHWxpBibZ9ERCr6W6lnCSjaQYhi7eygROYOezLThYgKppLxHCaSfQ//fIkU221s+H91yZJKa2nEF8n3gRtgup4GQALJ6jf18NESViLaYeYwysQ6aHbjZl9E9lo0lQ2z4i+q+4KXqhEwng93q+xbE89Dw97mCavjIg220jnwx05/L2EYRtGGWneZFm/dwTphjda2O2gPqHChtNDaN7bqjILxYlQoLTlmKpd79g1NSu0YvMGvld3qiMeDsasJAZ39oe7tBwWnbNzeEC/KSeNrn2A==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1mGLgH-00010J-B5; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 15:32:33 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <835yw354rb.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:272569 Archived-At: --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 03:14:32PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:33:49 +0200 > > From: > >=20 > > Now I assume I'm boring all of you with well-known things, but I > > really don't understand why .eln files would be so different that > > they can't follow (some variation of) the `load-path' pattern? >=20 > They can, and they do. See native-comp-eln-load-path. Assuming I > understood correctly what bothers you. Thanks. I think you do. Well, I'm quite certain :) Then what would prevent a distribution from distributing their .eln files to go somewhere in /usr/lib/emacs...//..., to be overriden by the user when needed? I've been following the native compilation threads with quite some excitement, but I'm sure I haven't digested many "interesting" details :) Cheers - t --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAmEdC/EACgkQBcgs9XrR2kavnQCfVhDJrG/Z/Z6uOQ935HTWbjcf V9EAnRmqJJ+BkQfvQiC1C5Mdijpqbodr =58nk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --liOOAslEiF7prFVr--