From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Partial wdired (edit just filename at the point) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:50:27 +0100 Message-ID: <20210322145026.GB16973@tuxteam.de> References: <87v99kgni5.fsf@logand.com> <20210322081250.GA28648@tuxteam.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20690"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Arthur Miller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 22 16:11:30 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lOMDK-0005JD-Gx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 16:11:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60404 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOMDJ-0006wv-GX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 11:11:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOLt7-0002Mp-Qx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:50:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:33242) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOLt5-0007a9-BV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:50:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=oSQrrdu9tk26aCEdbYoEdLTP2fhlhveZZ7FW0a+eFwc=; b=kxoX0YIATWr5+MBlIZQgiMZmqzpXvSJ+J2rxnDLUo0ri2415/z0RH1f8kfBJRo/oAWUQvPWPVbv8j2NNDYLLtjGXF7DACupXA8CcVjPgSCda4oBoZ+CF0rmRbMCMroKYWeocrDZ0hxTNV0CDSXx2Rl4WuDjWDmxXzB/bvmplC8IeXDNlNyMno+Mg2Qfl53DBqP8/TiHPHbqLRDvUQYdooz5bnO8yUYstPqrOMdN7H4OPSTYnPgye5lO/5jXhJe6f5bOX/yGz6ZBEB/fshKW9diMZZbeBZxyIjtsWi1fk8a1+WHf1kdXpcGHxmNBrrRlFmPOgP2ru6fJnmwQhGP/ZIw==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1lOLsx-0004bg-35; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:50:27 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266756 Archived-At: --4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 01:44:22PM +0100, Arthur Miller wrote: > writes: >=20 > > =E2=80=A2 When the code is byte-compiled, FUNCTION-OBJECT is co= mpiled > > into a byte-code function object (*note Byte Compilation::). > > > > =E2=80=A2 When lexical binding is enabled, FUNCTION-OBJECT is c= onverted > > into a closure. *Note Closures::. > > > > When FUNCTION-OBJECT is a symbol and the code is byte compiled, the > > byte-compiler will warn if that function is not defined or might > > not be known at run time. >=20 > And we this Perl-like overloading of an operator where it has different > meanings in different contexts which makes Perl such an ugly language to > read once the code is written :-). Hey, but I =E2=99=A5 Perl :) [...] > I like that idea from that book about early Lisp days about simplifying > the language. Feels like CL has gone away from that idea long time ago, > and ELisp is going CL route. Yes, but early Lisps were Lisp-2's (or rather Lisp-n's for some n>=3D2). And oh, BTW, Perl picked up that part, but made that explicit via the symbol "sigils". > Anyway, I messed up, when I sent my working code this weekend; I did > from an old laptop with old Emacs, I don't even understand why it worked > there or if I maybe send wrong version. Here is one patch that is > "almost" working: but for some reasons does not save permissions. I have > just brewed a fresh cup of coffee, so I'll see if I can see what is > wrong :). ;-) Cheers - t --4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAmBYrrIACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZalQCfVtM7AQYD37sE3NIMrKQyoTEq o+IAn0SOhpnkIiOuDEwSB/MW4xOJ8NAh =ZXKQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H--