From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-lock-fontify-block Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:19:06 +0100 Message-ID: <20210312151906.GA30919@tuxteam.de> References: <831rclmoy0.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgz9l9xw.fsf@gnu.org> <30f0a4188eb516fc37ed@heytings.org> <83wnucltxe.fsf@gnu.org> <496380cc602598836e8f@heytings.org> <83im5wlfdo.fsf@gnu.org> <496380cc606c8f42ec5b@heytings.org> <20210312130643.GF18812@tuxteam.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13161"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 12 16:27:50 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lKjhd-0003Lt-Vv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:27:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54800 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKjhc-0006CT-Vb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:27:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41068) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKjZJ-0004Mt-0k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:19:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:60248) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKjZG-0003da-3c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:19:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=EnsuuPb0zU0flXUjJjuflqn2HUpvQ2sDC+0wMvYbnec=; b=tpu970PRPhhr7bbDD92NArBNhjVQ82TOmYvu6gQ23Sdbb38sHgh+GmD2ovKaI6HFpTE0WNv5/wn0heiKEjtOqtA+pc180Zdtm7Ilwdh2qQUhriwd8p141UWYZH+pWsV9PxCbkWPcNxXY+hJc3lcOrzDpbTnKOEbSFLQYczAu0oymlT8Xc9ElxjTsjErdVo6LShIjMK85Q+md64SCEayQiecRNycAp0PzSLrJivoayVzv/nHonZJdPmwxKSHlUUlI32qbH5GCsebYw9IZ2uSo8LXr7D6lLG7Vqelxv/NvVklX+6FP0BkIpUbMZ9SJlKuE4zCevOvCQK3+0/kafEPWdQ==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1lKjZC-00087j-FM; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:19:06 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266403 Archived-At: --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 08:54:07AM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > But when doing such keybindings, please think of us poor sods with > > a non-US keyboard. For many, "C-M-|" degenerates to a "C-M-AltGr-|", > > which is... acrobatic :-) >=20 > Oh, come on, three modifiers plus the actual key is pretty far from > the limit (which is of course 20 except for those rare users who refuse > to use their feet). ^^^^ Pics or it didn't happen. Bonus points for a video workshop ;-D Back on topic: for me not that important, since this command is (for me) deeply in M-x land anyway. Cheers - t --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAmBLhmoACgkQBcgs9XrR2kbERACfcBlgUOKc5moBrG98a54C4jHF StAAni4vMGTowlgYgEPMHBgXAU4RWngy =bT8I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm--