From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-lock-fontify-block Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:07:33 +0100 Message-ID: <20210312130733.GG18812@tuxteam.de> References: <837dmdmw60.fsf@gnu.org> <831rclmoy0.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgz9l9xw.fsf@gnu.org> <30f0a4188eb516fc37ed@heytings.org> <83wnucltxe.fsf@gnu.org> <496380cc602598836e8f@heytings.org> <83im5wlfdo.fsf@gnu.org> <496380cc606c8f42ec5b@heytings.org> <83blbolecr.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0qt3EE9wi45a2ZFX" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31153"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Gregory Heytings , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 12 14:09:55 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lKhYB-00080H-IN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:09:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51218 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKhYA-0006HK-Jl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:09:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59440) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKhVz-0005Bj-Ug for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:07:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:59974) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKhVv-0001Ld-Gq; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:07:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:Date; bh=ZCbkcimi+LoddwU/szlGxoXBhWI4IquFOxm4SClC+QA=; b=QX5omShDSXmj/LSMTNhnbL9m0cOe8zi6Bw1fZGmJaGm6Pefqg2MByU2EMvHjJeZdiiIhvKX0Q2dD/aO8kr125OGHDy6acu7TRdsQNGC2HdFIOXVtZ/57uvzSyUY8DmTeBtrAkfODwr7oSCo5c8MgqoBpr+y8B8rznSE5y4adCXWWbJ8Z0v02vcTvOn2SZ4bATKGh9e6X8fKQu66SWqGxiDSp142mw75aXbMaEDVz/OlfKGTuJ2gSCQxrW2mJA9Z/X+UWrp4zlOlrdTRV7ge0Ux5W09lEirJWP0frm8jQQe8fEl6hRHDaIMYgYBh8YFtfoxUahrFwTHDbpMOZ1xs5lA==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1lKhVt-0006Sn-4f; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:07:33 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83blbolecr.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266394 Archived-At: --0qt3EE9wi45a2ZFX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 02:56:52PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:43:34 +0000 > > From: Gregory Heytings > > cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > >=20 > > I understand that you find the "C-x x f" not as convenient as "M-o M-o"= ,=20 > > although it seems to me that for a not-often-used command, that binding= =20 > > could be okay, but that's just me. What do you think of the "C-M-|"=20 > > binding I proposed? >=20 > It's slightly better, although having to press 3 modifier keys isn't > easy. Plus, it doesn't work on TTY frames. Ah, three. Your keyboard is as funny as mine is :) Cheers - t --0qt3EE9wi45a2ZFX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAmBLZ5UACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZPnwCeIIoGRKn/J2cCKtB+6OfdFCsf EhcAnRvcA75/xkCa4Gtt+U4VbCRSAhCL =c9Ng -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0qt3EE9wi45a2ZFX--