From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: git things [was: master 11abc4a: Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/scratch/lexical-gnus' into trunk] Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 17:34:23 +0100 Message-ID: <20210202163423.GD26805@tuxteam.de> References: <20210131223952.429.10439@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210131223954.A429420DF3@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87pn1jx91p.fsf@gnu.org> <20210202090632.GA26805@tuxteam.de> <83h7mu5w8o.fsf@gnu.org> <20210202160114.GC26805@tuxteam.de> <83eehy5tkd.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ylS2wUBXLOxYXZFQ" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16369"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, tsdh@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 02 18:14:22 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l6zFu-00046E-5D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 18:14:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39378 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6zFt-0002lA-3S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 12:14:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53930) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6ydI-0002Cu-R9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 11:34:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:32931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6ydG-0002my-BB; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 11:34:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=akOn+iyMof37Cqt7y01yGgkqSfZ/ahoevTjHHSoiXGU=; b=RoRfRAaM36g8aKYQMMoHzXkGTdQUWKCQXAz7bh01IX6b6C3WzEs3jZ/F4SPGmQ8QFRj/Mb5XN1uzASDhQ6kBsMqN7gVaCxp6jLUG7x/DaSWcY8mCo0OIN1V0OX0iqaK9UYDK46767TiURFQr/MXa8ZBuSvg1CJQxlgSVJx+j2+FmlnY9nOIkEliiFZvKN86+rRPfeGhTigsojTxsNeK4gcYHGp11PBePx50ua5Oc6Q3zv/uwkUPk6fXXrZ+DE/2nSPTzGP1zjTQsBXeM1XAXNZ30BRF6OhzuKwAaopx7VwF94tAGjobTftJYIbDEdPO7Nbci8Dh6VeUezTM+M6WmZA==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1l6ydD-0002hq-GX; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 17:34:23 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83eehy5tkd.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263729 Archived-At: --ylS2wUBXLOxYXZFQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 06:21:38PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 17:01:14 +0100 > > From: tomas@tuxteam.de > > Cc: tsdh@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > >=20 > > I hope my explanation uptext was at least of some help :) >=20 > As usual. Thanks > (What I wrote was not about your explanations, it was about > that single sentence.) Yes, I got that. I'm convinced this is a very personal thing: some people just "resonate" with the way an application (or, what's appriximately the same, a programming language ) works, some not (I think this is why discussions about such things tend to be heated :-) For me, the battle with git paid off handsomely. Cheers - t --ylS2wUBXLOxYXZFQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAmAZfw8ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kbPdwCcCAExks2bPvutpq2eSSG3PDWD q5wAn3afEyK0wubfVp8ggH4WKXHHD6M2 =7f/j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ylS2wUBXLOxYXZFQ--