From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ergus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28" Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 10:35:21 +0200 Message-ID: <20200909083521.fftcvhi6ec26a5wa@Ergus> References: <1ca462fa-0f9e-3c18-6386-f43f49388b2f@gmail.com> <20200907180812.5tfylspp7i6vl4o3@Ergus> <94fda087-a61b-356d-4bb4-791907593246@yandex.ru> <24302cf8-5ac8-4abd-83ce-3e33c51a8beb@default> <83k0x4mjsv.fsf@gnu.org> <831rjcmgn8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24839"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Dmitry Gutov , nicola.manca85@gmail.com, ams@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Arthur Miller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 09 10:36:28 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kFvad-0006MQ-CO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 10:36:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57100 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFvac-0005Qj-FP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 04:36:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39436) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFvZj-0004E0-0W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 04:35:31 -0400 Original-Received: from sonic301-2.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com ([74.6.129.41]:36065) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFvZg-0006PS-A3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 04:35:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aol.com; s=a2048; t=1599640526; bh=FK4xwAO2ehii8sj1virKBXHDP830XHN1y7ZrIThoRN8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=Pz/mzNJfWvxahjEMllGlRa23c4+FapCc2T+HV0ZtjQiFfXKWVs25Ab3qe+fh/0AQZrVn5/lNa4UhqTIE8Qsp/tsUtR0IEaycW6QUgzP/uSTj2392D36FVPw9/qb2y5gdRhG2H4z5UG0lHYk3HAMS6Ij5GT31q61gOGDCya7yk6x1qbQxcbMhGAlHHhXfMsGJN8/sj0zL+gkd8mlvpDHDFHNROcDdeIL2JOdTwmLC3S/qa40DJg63eAnV2bP13M28oetr/WtojOcHHXThjAWPsSdz/a5aIvadbhi7gioi2qTfCkkkhcqwsZ7+B6BUeZ9dBxCEy4dDh5M6gh4KJfhKwQ== X-YMail-OSG: t0tU8cYVM1koSVtINhgh2_7fkkrwCQHgeWb.z70bgbQIuXZZGGROy77syM2jUSW JCM6UwSRB.4RUjPswYWnhgu0to7Ztn1Gt4CAolK5rBgBgr.hDXuwSFoI9bz9LyN5ct4meJhLgFQ2 M3k1JfwI2avA2oLO502xnBCKOmC4IMMyd9OFhQBZktJBYd_6V7lggx3HU9e4IIoVom9bocBT9cKb czPm0uYtjx7ck9Ra_ob02_NVwDj8Dcyhp88BvIlP52dlkraRNfRbxD9efBgbUnWKjiah7wloz9zd u63yr5YZ7ZPNsXmX6ja.c1IYoGtlTQ.QDwBQHbeGj.XQlN4EydcrOxyFUIuhX.5aB3GLvDRDJLUF 5WSHFhsTHVLrqAKT_p5GLs.0Rkx8.UqYC7iTRhv.q2_RKro1hjk3p7IWQ30zCQxtM.IfF6R1JNv4 4tH_yP9W4Ef7HK.z5kSyi3FTAb0qsAjYQ3SlUaq6OORiVqsgi.C4Tk2fmSHe0BMPvbEsVQSfrJW5 R30CorX67JfdiFjQImn9_7mHOXuD4nVFjJNPoN74YivsiFkuyOJi7M7RtaveavwuFH3OVjG6W3Q1 TToCiHmbEgBJKVxn2fASezCZ0kTd8prhRimzAMqlbrSZgFyt..oQK7sfWS27NFa57a.wjiSWDGZq 02A0RFnwthXIv31Pm5LNEk7114Ld22awmjluCQ7.yxnjs12KOwZLpB5a_R0Bw4gPi86g81Hz.A4H SRIOPGLvVkw9H6Tgdx2jRXmxys9Imc0MLqcYXfEJg5oDBHSMhBOZl9I8S4pyVFEje34x85tX1AtN MAf8yIXSRbu4cClB4cXBrucys3xwU_sm8cJWD5diLV Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic301.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 08:35:26 +0000 Original-Received: by smtp402.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 8fe8dee4993a1657c0b74456fe9d0bf8; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 08:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.16583 mail.backend.jedi.jws.acl:role.jedi.acl.token.atz.jws.hermes.aol Apache-HttpAsyncClient/4.1.4 (Java/11.0.7) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.6.129.41; envelope-from=spacibba@aol.com; helo=sonic301-2.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/09 04:35:26 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -10 X-Spam_score: -1.1 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:254854 Archived-At: Hi Arthur: The non technical part of the "popularity" problem is 1) the lack of interaction of core emacs developers with the communities outside (github independent package developers, reddit, telegram groups) It happens to me once that I knew about an error in a feature I implemented because someone talk about it in a Telegram group about emacs in Spanish. They didn't report the issue because they didn't know how to do so (they were looking on github/issues as usual) but also because they didn't know enough english. 2) "Publicity" I mean, we "haven't invested" / "don't know how" to sale better what we have. It is like having a shop with amazing products no advertisements, dark entrance but even if a client gets in; most of the products are not exhibited but he has to ask for them sometimes in a special code. On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 07:03:09AM +0200, Arthur Miller wrote: >Eli Zaretskii writes: > >>> Cc: nicola.manca85@gmail.com, spacibba@aol.com, drew.adams@oracle.com, >>> emacs-devel@gnu.org >>> From: Dmitry Gutov >>> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 18:02:10 +0300 >>> >>> On 08.09.2020 17:20, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> > Once more complex >>> > situation arise, my opinion is that undo-tree is more complex and >>> > harder to grasp than the Emacs undo, so I don't think undo-tree is >>> > better suited to newbies than the default undo. >>> >>> I'm pretty sure undo-tree is better for complex situations thanks to of >>> its visualization interface. >> >> If visualization is the main advantage, we could have visualization >> for the default undo as well. That's not the complex part, and not >> what differentiates between the 2 undo's. > >I would like to connect this discussion back to some earlier discussions >about how to make Emacs more popular, and this recent what changes >people want to see. > >As I see almost everyone agrees that Emacs has best undo-redo mechanism >that is out there, right? I tend to agree with this. I think you should >"market" this much better then you do. First and foremost, I think you >should give it a bit more advanced term, something like: >"non-destructive text editing", rather then undo-redo. The new term >should not be a replacement but a completition to old undo-redo term. > >Why such term? > >1. It describes better how Emacs undo-redo works and also distincts >Emacs from other software which has simpler undo-redo facilitie. > >2. It gives you opportunity to market a unique and distinctive Emacs >feature that actually gives more value to the user. > >A popular photo-editing tool by a big software house is very proud to >market their non-destructive photo-editing tools and people are writing >blog posts and book chapters to point out the benefits and how to work >with it. Emacs should not be different in this regard. > >Next, implement undo-tree visualisation (graph) as Eli suggests. No idea >if you can just adapt undo-tree code or have to write new. Personally I >don't use undo-tree nor have it installed longer; but I do think the >idea is very cool. Also, regardless if I personally see it just as a >gimmick, I think it is a distinctive feature of Emacs to have a >graphical and interactive visualisation of undo-redo history; I don't >know of any other text editor with such capability. It would be nice if >it used unicode characters to create more graph-like chart instead of >ascii chars. > >I think the Emacs undo-redo and it's visualisation, can be one of so >called "selling points" when it comes to Emacs (one of many of course). > >Another feature I would like to see is if it would be possible to >"freeze" (remove) undo-history in order to save memory. This operation >would remove old-undo information, like if the document was just >opened/created. > >I would never thought that undo-redo in a piece of software can be such >a passionate discussion subject, but yet here we are ... :-) >