From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Modernize frame-title-format: "%b - GNU Emacs" Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 18:00:19 +0200 Message-ID: <20200827160019.GA12547@tuxteam.de> References: <83y2m01me0.fsf@gnu.org> <97bc0151-cca1-404f-a68c-e1fd4ad99b20@default> <20200827151407.GA10763@tuxteam.de> <499f9ce5-4d0c-4daa-ad3c-7442a595ab55@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zhXaljGHf11kAtnf" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19767"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 27 18:03:03 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kBKMh-00053u-Fb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 18:03:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58370 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBKMg-0002Ez-Ff for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34040) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBKKC-0007d2-E5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:00:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:45677) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBKK6-0003vw-Tv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:00:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=BW7Ajvbkll/BJq6EGkhSSGj002xZ6n0XxzvNLIUf9d0=; b=flQ91GxpuvgrsDpRzZeNJpYqDOs+yqSM5h6HGAUHdvDCxfdzcC/tHxCQTCRNjMD8hPddA9S0nmvFKWJDgb1SEQJ3O/Rif02i4YqAaUU7l0re/7I+tvmPAH8lKhBdd7R9oiVYpvizZTOTE4Lb74cOJ1sgZBWKXZETg6UeVhmWcOcsbFUdgaqA6BXQ4Tl80pfEwiucTOw92kjh4h+tRmOlEdL/XOM1wc0ivixmRu7JNQJ6OfxbmRsHZJJ7v3RXjrX11GgvRLSoBxORJNyoylY3kcnKqhoHA9tl8mQydrVbNiQwjoj7bjTuuQcYNyoESPwj05ipY8KrQFJpTh+rk3ET0A==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1kBKK3-0003II-90; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 18:00:19 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <499f9ce5-4d0c-4daa-ad3c-7442a595ab55@default> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/27 11:04:18 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:254306 Archived-At: --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 08:24:59AM -0700, Drew Adams wrote: > > > [I even object to the Subject line: "Modernize...". > >=20 > > This is called "Dark Pattern" and is, in itself, pretty modern these > > days :-) >=20 > ;-) >=20 > But the term is recent (if 2010 is recent), not "modern". My language mastery is too humble to dare a choice here. > > (I'm not implying that the OP is aware of this -- on the contrary). >=20 > Yes, in this case, so dark that OP was no doubt > unaware. Subliminal advertising hits even the > advertiser sometimes. ;-) Viral, so to speak. Cheers - t --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAl9H2JMACgkQBcgs9XrR2kbSrQCcDYcBfVmoT6NdLVe03uqzMzi8 GDMAn2Koev+B2QFb/1f34ef0kzm7V+rD =tnaP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf--