From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Emacs as a translator's tool Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:38:07 +0200 Message-ID: <20200610133807.GB23905@tuxteam.de> References: <87bllypckg.fsf@ebih.ebihd> <87tuzpmnuo.fsf@mbork.pl> <87bllu4lx0.fsf@ebih.ebihd> <87blluxfcq.fsf@mbork.pl> <1rmqrrvn.fsf@ebih.ebihd> <87sgf5xry2.fsf@mbork.pl> <87ftb5qodp.fsf@ebih.ebihd> <87ftb4xcf4.fsf@mbork.pl> <87h7vkklij.fsf@ebih.ebihd> <20200610133503.GA23905@tuxteam.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E39vaYmALEf/7YXx" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="55501"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 10 15:47:41 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jj14v-000EPC-2A for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:47:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57408 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jj14u-0000LK-38 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:47:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33550) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jj0vi-0005Be-8R for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:38:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:43157) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jj0vg-0002TX-Tg for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:38:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=PcydaXR5BoOW+X+JMxSJQ+VRG+sbv0yTfVv1MIqtYMc=; b=A27IW7Gpg9sjPZ6V8+UBe4neiN3gcviUJGJLcEqlXzgZxS6t6Sc/AhBFrp7S537wd7DTKlPdj5Fd5bCfCOfZqGZQOGSgfykuSZuxbK42Y+/kohKtlmK7Fb/eIw+TG6Bq0cECAsQPpiD0kIv7tlo8K0Xa1WYle2g8waiOAKTsR1BADtPcHQvhk9OaUc6d+lUHfsImWeydXibVGDTBSV05RPizhdzkAMQ+sxaC1R3PZUGCGFWaqQJjMQb5eIc1gQlD56QtFmGz5i531TGclAQSYsSLrYGoECRn0fXSs86ajrRVorbKBpXFzUSJNh4sj/eNjgT0qpbr0OQzBUFe4p3GyA==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jj0vf-0006IO-N7 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:38:07 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200610133503.GA23905@tuxteam.de> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/10 09:35:04 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:123312 Archived-At: --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 03:35:03PM +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 10:54:44PM +0200, Emanuel Berg via Users list for= the GNU Emacs text editor wrote: > > Marcin Borkowski wrote: > >=20 > > > 1. It is inefficient, in the sense that every > > > overlay belongs to some buffer. No need to keep the > > > variable `source-buffer'. > >=20 > > I don't understand? >=20 > The overlay already "knows" to which buffer it belongs. See > function (overlay-buffer OVERLAY). Uh -- I see downtrhead you already got it. Sorry for chiming in late to the party. Cheers -- t --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAl7g4j8ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kairwCfStWrA9IIh03ObK/hKa7KO4+F uLAAn1dRDwlESKxWs1s2hEvYob1SWRss =AiWl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx--