From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41618: 28.0.50; Can't byte-compile an edebugged macro Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 17:41:53 +0000 Message-ID: <20200531174153.GA30946@ACM> References: <20200531170119.11733.qmail@mail.muc.de> <83wo4sjam6.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="89697"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 41618@debbugs.gnu.org, p.stephani2@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 31 19:47:28 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jfS3R-000N8A-SW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 31 May 2020 19:47:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33306 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfS3Q-000874-QG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 31 May 2020 13:47:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34658) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfRyE-0001Vw-Bj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 31 May 2020 13:42:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50452) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfRyE-0005IC-1j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 31 May 2020 13:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jfRyD-00034r-TR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 31 May 2020 13:42:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 17:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41618 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41618-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41618.159094691711819 (code B ref 41618); Sun, 31 May 2020 17:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41618) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 May 2020 17:41:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33765 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jfRy9-00034Y-EZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 May 2020 13:41:57 -0400 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:57030 helo=mail.muc.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jfRy7-00034O-8a for 41618@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 May 2020 13:41:56 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 39609 invoked by uid 3782); 31 May 2020 17:41:53 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p4fe154b5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.225.84.181]) by localhost.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Sun, 31 May 2020 19:41:53 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 31461 invoked by uid 1000); 31 May 2020 17:41:53 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83wo4sjam6.fsf@gnu.org> X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:181307 Archived-At: Hello, Eli. On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 20:08:17 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: 31 May 2020 17:01:19 -0000 > > From: Alan Mackenzie > > Cc: 41618-done@debbugs.gnu.org > > I've committed a fix to the emacs-27 branch > Thanks, but why to emacs-27? Is this bug a regression from Emacs 26? It was difficult to decide, but emacs-27 seemed right; the bug was almost certainly a regression from Emacs 26, the erroneous commit having been made on 2019-07-27. Also the fix was utterly safe, having been exhaustively tested (i.e. make bootstrap worked). > If not, it doesn't sound to me like a problem that should be fixed > urgently, the use case is not really that frequent, and there's an > easy workaround. It produced an obscure error message, for which only somebody in the know would be able to apply a workaround. > I'd prefer not to push anything to emacs-27 that doesn't absolutely > have to be there. OK. I've felt a bit unclear about this over the past few weeks. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).