From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Ligatures Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 21:07:35 +0200 Message-ID: <20200518190735.GA9798@tuxteam.de> References: <20200517165953.000044d2@web.de> <83lflqblp0.fsf@gnu.org> <83ftbybio3.fsf@gnu.org> <83zha69xs2.fsf@gnu.org> <83367x9qeq.fsf@gnu.org> <20200518172441.GD31606@tuxteam.de> <83v9kt87ka.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="99510"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 18 21:08:52 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jal86-000PlG-Pq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 18 May 2020 21:08:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38598 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jal85-0004jB-T1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 18 May 2020 15:08:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51656) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jal70-0003cP-Mm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2020 15:07:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:60207) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jal6v-0003J1-Id; Mon, 18 May 2020 15:07:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=VkPi257/aSvQVOuUOa30dWxntlH39ECrvAK9Ygoyjp4=; b=QrSs8ha6287FaaGU0ttpuqjKIfz0d6xYqx2gGUO8LcqIEoUqO7SR3XXOUau+CgVnUKeLqmU9B18AD16BRRbthxdJ1/rX+RwbbBwnth8g8wMjIzJ5iiJZ11pn3ALNqESvlaRghfgWW047IIh2iyFhtS6cgQIBUXr3425AcEnVdfeUx9d94bdsp1nwbBD/fUyDmlGkNXt8i1VNzqkhtCPZYqXUW5eYxLc1YlG3EA53rxsewASgrMkrxqa5b141Y/Y3f+iRygIH8wCUQM/HRojhHi35sNbSWkrMDbXbA2vi6kSvMJGFbS6C693GQoHXvyBxu5A9vT1Jub8P+l0DAlNW2A==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jal6t-0002ia-9d; Mon, 18 May 2020 21:07:35 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83v9kt87ka.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/18 11:33:59 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:250802 Archived-At: --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 08:41:09PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 19:24:41 +0200 > > From: > >=20 > > > If Harfbuzz could tell us more precisely how to divide the glyph into > > > subglyphs, we could do a better job, of course. > >=20 > > On a very superficial glance it seems they can [1] > >=20 > > Cheers > > [1] https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/blob/master/docs/usermanual-cl= usters.xml >=20 > AFAIK, each "cluster" corresponds to a single font glyph, and we > already get this information from HarfBuzz, see hbfont.c. I see, thanks. As I said, my reading was a very cursory. I'm sure you read that doc much more thoroughly than me :-) Thanks for the insights Cheers -- tom=C3=A1s --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAl7C3PcACgkQBcgs9XrR2kbvLACcC7+3S7DA2brmfz6683uKTP2x iEsAnRhFPoej12nr3nlKx73R5xUqoXCl =kDYm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4--