From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Jean Louis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41097: 28.0.50; (dired-toggle-marks) not working after copy Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 18:33:11 +0300 Message-ID: <20200510153311.GH28606@protected.rcdrun.com> References: <20200506144423.GW24998@protected.rcdrun.com> <20200508132924.GI14650@protected.rcdrun.com> <87r1vukl86.fsf@web.de> <20200509042353.GA15309@protected.rcdrun.com> <87h7wonnuh.fsf@fliptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20200510095646.GA22962@protected.rcdrun.com> <83y2pzdgt7.fsf@gnu.org> <20200510145503.GE28606@protected.rcdrun.com> <83sgg7ddtz.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="92193"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/1.14.0 (2020-05-02) Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, tomasn@posteo.net, 41097@debbugs.gnu.org, arthur.miller@live.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 10 17:48:24 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jXoBk-000NsT-6i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 17:48:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42618 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXoBi-0007uC-Ms for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 11:48:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55986) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXoBW-0007t6-E0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 11:48:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38718) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXoBO-0001jB-Ch for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 11:48:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jXoBO-0003r5-By for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 11:48:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jean Louis Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 15:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41097 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41097-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41097.158912562514676 (code B ref 41097); Sun, 10 May 2020 15:48:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41097) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2020 15:47:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50259 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jXoAT-0003oZ-LJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 11:47:05 -0400 Original-Received: from stw1.rcdrun.com ([217.170.207.13]:39765) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jXnxL-0003LY-E0 for 41097@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 11:33:31 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([::ffff:41.210.154.28]) (AUTH: PLAIN securesender, TLS: TLS1.2,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by stw1.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 000000000006FD13.000000005EB81EBF.00003029; Sun, 10 May 2020 08:33:18 -0700 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83sgg7ddtz.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 10 May 2020 11:47:03 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:180010 Archived-At: * Eli Zaretskii [2020-05-10 18:12]: > Because t toggles marks, and C is not a mark, it's a flag. > > If the doc string which you quoted several times said this: > > Toggle marks: marked files become unmarked, and vice versa. > Flagged files (indicated with flags such as ‘C’ and ‘D’, not > with ‘*’) are not affected, and ‘.’ and ‘..’ are never toggled. > > would that prevent the confusion? That makes sense to me now.